Dmitry Sheffelenko, chief business officer of confusion, said he does not want to witness an experience on how Google’s monopoly is resolved because he is afraid to take revenge on Google. But after calling for an appearance before the court, he seized a moment to provide a job opportunity for his artificial intelligence company: buy Chrome.
If the judge sees Amit Mihata things the way the Ministry of Justice works, He could have Google to take out the famous web browser – Including free source chrome browser, which has been built many other web browsers. Google says this treatment plays with fire, and it may lead to a new owner of the chromium for the product or failure to keep it work enough, causing effects of ripples through the browser industry.
But the confusion will be happy to share the project. When a lawyer asked whether confusion believes that anyone besides Google can run a Chrome browser without reducing his quality or shipping, she replied shevelexo, “I think we can do it.”
This is not the first time that Ai Upstart has put its name in the ring to take over a major technology platform under the siege by the US government. A company less than three years It is also believed that he can buy TiktokAnd, which is always facing a ban in the United States about national security concerns based on its ownership by China -based BYTEDANCE.
Although Shevelenko was not a voluntary witness – it was called by the Ministry of Justice to show how Google’s monopoly affects the new AI companies – it seemed ready to put his grievances against Google. He described the “Gypsy gym” for Android settings in which the user needs to move to determine the confusion as a virtual assistant for Amnesty International, and he admitted that he had even contact a colleague to help him do this (Shevelexo also admitted that he is a long user on iPhone). Even once Perplexity is set as a virtual setting on Google on Android, he has seen, he still does not have the same Google’s position, because the user needs to press a button to activate it, instead of using the word “Hey Google”.
Companies with Google mainly have a “gun to [their] head”
During the interrogation of the Ministry of Justice, Shevelenko walked through an unknown list of phone makers, which spoke at the confusion about a deal to make it a previously downloaded search engine or virtual assistant in the United States, but it failed to hit a deal. In talks with one of the companies whose name was hidden from the public, Shefflenko said that the discussion remained “hitting the wall because they were afraid to lose the Google or Google Conventions.” As, Shivellenko witnessed that companies under a contract with Google mainly have a “weapon to [their] “Because Google can stop the large revenue share if they do something that hates Google.
In the first phase of the situation in which Google used exclusion agreements with phone and browser companies to lock distribution channels, and many of these agreements prevent companies from making certain types of deals that can replace the state of Google on their products.
She said Chefflanco from another company – which is based on General reports seem to be Motorola – He agreed to the prior loading of confusion on its devices, but it will not make the virtual assistant “although both parties want to be.” He witnessed that the confusion and the phonemaker “tried every creative solution” to evade Google’s restrictions, but although the company believed that the assistant of confusion would be “great for its users”, they were unable to find a way “to get out of Google’s obligations” and establish it as the failure to pay.
Shevelenko attributed to the judge’s referee as the reason that it can enter these talks at all. He said that the fact that Google is under pressure. On LinkedIn It argues that Google should not be “dismantled”. His company appears more interested in ending Google Search Distribution Agreements. In the court, Shefflenko warned that it would be a flammable to see a company like Openai Buy Chrome (as one of its executives. Tuesday witnessed that it will be open to) Stop the open source of chrome or failure to support the product adequately. He said: “There are all the incentives that serve themselves to be here today and scream about the extent of the villain of Google, and I think we want to be held.” He added that Google builds good products that others can repeat. “We don’t want a treatment that disturbs Google’s ability to continue doing this.”
