As head of the Police Syndicate, Jim Palmer has a final duty to support the welfare of more than 10,000 men and women wearing blue throughout Wisconsin.
Now, Mr. Palmer and the police all over the country say that their safety may have been undermined by the country’s CEO, who ran a presidential campaign for law and order and benefited from the support of many branches of local and national unions.
Why did we write this
In the aftermath of President Trump’s amnesty for rioters on January 6, the police question the long -term impact on the police and public safety.
On the first day of his new mandate, President Donald Trump issued an excuse for nearly 1,600 people who were convicted or faced criminal charges regarding the American Capitol attack on January 6, 2021.
Now the National Association of Police Organizations and other police unions are opposed to amnesty decisions, saying that violence against police officers constitutes an attack on American traditions related to the law and the regime.
In opposition to the January 6 sanctions, Trump supporters accuse the rioters of social justice on the left similarly. But the police arrested at least 11,000 people during the 2020 protests, according to the Buzfeed website.
“The police … give a meaning to the constitution,” says Michael Scott, former police chief of Laudrhali, Florida, who is now working as a crime scientist at Arizona State University in Timby, who opposes the amnesty. “Who – which [meaning] It is mainly re -negotiated. These are deep things.
As head of the Police Syndicate, Jim Palmer has a final duty to support the welfare of more than 10,000 men and women wearing blue throughout Wisconsin.
Now, Mr. Palmer and the police all over the country say that their safety may have been undermined by the country’s CEO, who ran a presidential campaign for law and order and benefited from the support of many branches of local and national unions.
On the first day of his new mandate this week, President Donald Trump issued an excuse for nearly 1,600 people who were convicted or faced criminal charges of attacking the American Capitol building on January 6, 2021, injuring more than 130 police officers. He sent a telegram about his intention to issue an amnesty on January 6, but the immediate and semi -complete postponement – the dangerous judgments were reduced instead of pardoning only 14 accused – surprised many Americans.
Why did we write this
In the aftermath of President Trump’s amnesty for rioters on January 6, the police question the long -term impact on the police and public safety.
“Many officers are disappointed,” says Mr. Palmer, CEO of the Professional Police Association in Wisconsin.
The National Association of Police Organizations – which is a member of it – is a member – steadily Pardon Tuesday. Likewise, the fraternal police system and the International Police Association And they expressed their fears jointly And that when those who commit crimes – especially the violence targeting the police – do not face consequences, “this sends a dangerous message that can encourage others.”
The unions also criticized former President Joe Biden, who, before leaving his position this month, reduced the penalty of a person convicted of killing law enforcement officers. However, their joint statement came in the wake of the action that took the day of the inauguration of President Trump.
Police safety – and public safety – at stake
Given this resistance, the amnesty issued by President Trump, especially for those convicted of attacking the police, could be a political miscalculation.
For many Americans – most of them He opposes pardon For rioters on January 6 – it undermines the idea that violence against officers is an attack on American traditions and its appreciation of law and order.
“When the police officers are killed or injured, this is almost similar to political assassination,” said Michael Scott, a former police officer in Madison, Wisconsin, who is now a criminal world at Arizona State University in Timby. “There is a risk that some people explain this procedure as the president says:” You are soldiers in our revolution. “
Many of those who stormed the Capitol building on January 6 were behaving based on the actions of President Trump False allegations of winning The 2020 elections were aimed at preventing the approval of Mr. Biden’s victory, which was scheduled to be held on that day.
Fears about the amnesty issued by President Trump not only related to abstract principles. The persons who attacked the officers will be released physically on January 6, and the officers witnessed against them in court. These individuals heard President Trump describing them as “patriots” and “political prisoners”.
Enrique Tario, a former Boys Boys leader, who is convicted of inflammatory for his role in organizing riots in the Capitol, called for revenge on those who achieved with the defendants on January 6 and their rulers.
“The people who did so should feel the heat,” Mr. Tario said in an audio broadcast after his release this week. “We have to find them and put them behind bars because of what they did.”
At least one former law enforcement officer in the capital He said he sought A protective order this week, to no avail, against those who assaulted him on January 6.
Many police officers enjoyed Trump’s banner for the police over the past decade, especially after the controversial events, including the killing of George Floyd by the Minneapolis police officer, which led to protests calling for police reform across the country. It is possible that Mr. Trump’s early police unions have played a role in his 2016 victory.
But experts say that this week’s response to the new amnesty issued by the president is not surprising.
“If their support is really rooted [the belief] “Trump is committed to a more aggressive understanding of the criminal justice system, well, this is not this,” says Benjamin Levin, a professor at Washington University at St. Louis Rights College.
It included amnesty for those who attacked the American Capitol building those who have not committed violence, as well as those who carried firearms, electric shock pistols and knives in the fight, according to the US Public Prosecutor’s Office.
The jury bodies also condemned some for conspiring to incite the sedition, which indicate the activities that undermine the state without attacking it directly.
Defending the pardon
Trump defended the pardon in front of journalists this week at the White House.
“They spent years in prison,” Trump said, according to press accounts. He said, “They didn’t have to serve. We have pardoned the people who were incredibly badly treated.”
Persons are routinely hurt or killed by police officers compared to condemnation of other crimes.
In opposition to the January 6 sanctions, Trump supporters often refer to the failure to hold rioters accountable for social justice from the political left. But during the 2020 protests, some of which were accompanied by riots, the police arrested at least 11,000 peopleAccording to Buzzfeed Statistics.
Mr. Trump also defended his step by citing a large number of amnesty operations issued by Mr. Biden, including amnesty for members of the House of Representatives Committee on January 6 and its relatives.
Although the presidential amnesty torrent may be a disturbing precedent, Professor Levin says there is also room for meaningful reforms in the American criminal justice system – including raising awareness among skeptics of reform on how to apply abstract concepts of crime and punishment in the real world . .
“A part of what makes the reaction to the sixth of January (January) is an interesting degree that Trump and his supporters have become more willing to consider the context of the punishment,” he says.
Meanwhile, one of the defendants in the January 6 case objected to Mr. Trump’s actions. Pamela Himville rejected the presidential pardon, and told the local newspaper “Idahu Stetman”, which was the acceptance of the amnesty.It will be an insult To the Capitol police officers, to the rule of law, to our nation. ”
Her feeling was reflected in the reaction of the police unions this week.
“There is a very real and deep concern in American law enforcement devices that much of what they have sworn to, for a long time, is at risk,” says Professor Scott, who also served as chief of police in Lauderhin, Florida. . “The police … give meaning to the constitution. – which – which – which [meaning] It is mainly re -negotiated. These are deep things.
