Disney’s Lilo & Stitch Remake Is a Soulless Copy

Disney Disney Animated Classic 2002 is a unique wonder. It seems that a new edition of direct work looks like a loud tradition without a soul.
Photo: Disney
Are people red drafted? Lilo and GMT Think of recycling Lilo and GMT It was a good idea? One assumes that they did this-a lot of work goes to re-offer Disney live that anyone makes against their will-but this new version exudes a tangible calculation of frustration. The image of Brigadier Fleischer is often a loyal camp without mercy Christopher Sanders and Dean Dipplos 2002 originBut all of the tone and its spirit is wrong – as if the directors realized that they had sinned in trying this new version and desperately looked at its coverage. Thus, it was never one day that the dreams of the alertness in the afternoon, the lazy, madness, and the superior of a movie that has now become a feverish scientific imagination, is often unfamiliar. You may distract young children with his excessive story line, but most of the magic has disappeared.
The plot points are still largely intact. Stitch, a small, strange experience that foreigners created in a more advanced angle than the universe, escapes from families and lands in Hawaii, on the far planet “Eee-AAWRTH”. There, he pretends to be a dog and is adopted by Tyke Lilo Pelekai (Maia Kealoha), who lives with her teenage sister Nani (Sydney Elizebeth Agudong). Their fathers have died, so Nani is struggling to cover their expenses and serve as a guardian responsible for Lilo in the hope of preserving the services of children. A distorted stitch (expressed by Sanders himself, who left Disney years ago but my contract I still get the sound Among his unbearable most eraser), it makes things more difficult, especially since he is now being followed by the strange foreign duo.
It is a ridiculous story, and she worked wonderfully in 2002 because she felt off the cuff, such as a fantasy and spontaneous explosion. He had a great relationship with his appearance. origin Lilo and GMT It was among the last Disney Features of the animation drawn by hand. At the time of its production, the company’s partnership with Pixar has already resulted in many huge moves to the computer, such as Game (1995) and Life (1998), some executives asked if it was Lilo and GMT It should also be in this new and popular coordination. But many wonder the movie It came from the animation style – From round faces and the numbers of the Sanders’ character designs; One of the hard -working watercolors (invisible in Disney’s feature since the 1940s); From the way it seems to be the entire film, with a mixture of science fiction, and it seems that it reveals as if someone was going. To try to put this story in a realistic world-either by living or computer graphics-would have been self-defeated.
That is. Sometimes he feels that movie makers realized this somewhere along the way. So the new movie compensates for the excessive original hair and calm engineering. This is new Lilo and GMT Fast and disappointing, not in particular entertaining. The image plays at the Stitch, every scene in the chaos-which is not affected by this uniqueness of Teddy Bear in everything. The soft edges of the animation and the soft mood in the original contradictory with the created strange, so we really felt the turmoil; It was a stitch like a joke that the movie was playing on itself. This is not due to the narration, and he also emphasized that when things calm down – when Stitch became part of the Lilo family and achieved a sense of belonging – the emotional sobriety at the moment we really struck. It is one of the reasons behind this Lilo and GMT One of the few household efforts of the mouse from the period after the Renaissance in Disney to the active tears is still from the most eyes.
As for this one … not much. This is a surprise, because the previous advantage of the director Camp was 2022 Marcel crust with shoesA hybrid reserved and stalled with a superior sensitivity that is not different from the first Lilo and GMT. Both pictures felt like reckless ideas that were drifted to their climax unexpectedly. To give any movie, the quality of the innovative logo graphics is difficult enough, but to stop it in animation, or in a movie that includes animation (and thus requires a lot of preparation and trading), it is supernaturally. We can see what the camp made an ideal match for this article.
Perhaps the amazing nature of this project is to decline. Many scenes feel that they were repeated almost perfect, leading to the formation of shots. (There are also suitable winks for fans, including the welcome from the members of the indigenous team TIA Carrre and Jason Scott Lee.) Unfortunately, sincerity highlights the uniqueness of the source and the lack of spirit of the copy. It reminds us of that Lilo and GMTIts shape and essence were one. This new version does not feel like her own movie, but rather a tight attempt to re -engineer a miracle.