In an industry that is proud of disruption, wearing clothing has become a kind of dominance, also unlike the ideology of technology at that time: innovation on traditions, excessive efficiency, and at least in its early days – the belief that technology is present to serve people, not just profit from them.
Indeed, in the early first decade of the twentieth and 2010 century, the largest TECH names presented itself as visions on a mission to give the democratic character to reach life, improve life, and build a better future. The industry has placed itself as a fee of Wall Street greed, and the uniforms apparently from shirts, covers, and sports shoes have strengthened this distinction. Technology leaders were not glamorous in custom allowances; They have solved problems, engineers, and ideals, and they work on a utopian vision of progress.
“Zuckerberg’s style has turned something from a certain group of American billionaires who are in line with what appears to be a new political system in the United States,” says Wilde. “These Mongols control multinational companies, which include Meta, Google, Amazon and Uber, which have an extraordinary ability to influence people’s decisions, which are thus the main political figures to moderate.” While the Biden administration did this through the judicial arm of the government and legal courts, President Trump appears to tend to deal with these men through the Personal Court, where they are asked to request his approval.
“We have seen this in Trump Presidential opening“The invitations formed from the American billionaires. For me, there are strong similarities with the royal courts in the Middle Ages, where the aristocracy members compete among themselves, often in what they wear and how they consume, for the ruler’s interest and care. . Inside America today, these men seem less concerned about their perception of the public, more concerned about how they appear to each other, and Trump. ”
Currently, some Bruce Technology –Sam Taman Including – still clinging to their bulls and spoilers, but how long before their appearance develops to suit the growing power they enjoy? OpenaiAfter all, it seems that it is happening Darmed every day. Then there is Sundar Pichai, the quiet architect of the Google AI Empire, whose costumes may not release the headlines (so far) but its policies are definitely. Under his watch, Alphabet canceled her long promise to develop Artificial intelligence of weapons Or monitoring.
So what next? Titanium Richard Mail built billionaires with defense contracts? Brunello Cocinelli for the detailed cashmere with “in artificial intelligence we trust”? Pichai has already disposed of the new balance note for those Lanvin sneakers, with noise shoes a previous billionaire gateway. (Zuck from the tendency to Adidas 4DFWD X, the conflicting coaches.) If the new technological dress law is everything from referring to dominance, it will not take a long time before it follows Pachai and Altman followed it. Because in Silicon Valley, not only power has been used – it is now wearing it.
Fluid from re -enrollment
The strange thing? Few interrogate the transformation of Mark Zuckerberg. Most of the comments are proven on What and how-Current fitness, designed accessories, and aesthetic to fight-from Why. This confirms the continued gender inequality. When Kamala Harris was nominating the positions, her aesthetic options were released unabated. However, the development of Zuckerberg was curiously instead of criticism. “He highlights the impunity from the punishment that powerful men can re -invent themselves,” says Wilde.
For Zuckerberg, the shift from a student who recites a lot of embarrassing technology to the leader who has been trained to fight, reflects the broader path of Silicon Valley itself. The original model of Hodi’s disease covered with something more hidden, more aggressive. The new technology oligarchy is not only related to the control of perception; It comes to controlling the entire industries – perhaps Even countries. An increasingly, it works outside the scope of traditional accountability.
