For nearly 60 years, California has enjoyed the ability to determine its criteria that govern air pollution from cars, as long as it is stricter than the federal government. This rule, which was written in the clean air law, was aimed at realizing the long state leadership in regulating air emissions.
The US Senate undermined this authority on Thursday when it voted from 51 to 44 to cancel the relief agency that agreed to allow the golden state to implement and impose an actual ban on the sale of gasoline cars by 2035. The Senate also canceled the waiver of California for phrases in the new Diselle equipment.
The ecosystems soon denounced the voices, saying that California standards are necessary to protect public health and achieve the goals of reducing emissions at the country level. The rules are considered a type of national standard because auto companies do not create separate production lines: one for California and another for everyone. A ruling in the clean air law also allows other countries to adopt the standards of Golden State; 16 states and Colombia Province adopted many rules set by the California Air Resources Council.
“These criteria are vital in protecting people from vehicle pollution that causes asthma attacks and other serious health problems,” said Dan Lashouf, an older colleague at the Universal Universal Institute of Resources, in a statement.
However, legal and political experts at a more amazing level, objected to the way the members of the Senate canceled California: They were used in 1996 Congress Review LawOr CRA, a law that was allowed to allow Congress to cancel some federal procedures by a simple majority, instead of 60 usual votes. Two government monitoring said that the action does not apply to the state’s concession.
“Republicans wrapped the bases of the Senate,” said Joanna Sultan, a deputy head of political and government affairs at the Non -profit environmental defense fund. A professor of the University of California Law in Los Angeles Ann Carlson warned in Blog post Before voting that Congress “may open the Bandora box that cannot be closed”, and that “there will be no end to the use of Cra to cancel all kinds of procedures that the verb is not covered.”
At the heart of the controversy is whether the air pollution gave the Environmental Protection Agency to California last year Qualifying as a “base” under CRA. Each of the government accountability office, a non -party supervision agency, and parliament in the Senate, which is a non -party specified in charge of interpreting the bases and procedures of Congress, issued Consulting opinions Earlier this year Say this no. Republican Senator Mike Li, from Utah, seems to agree with this interpretation: a 1 and educator In a bill, he suggested canceling the waiver of California that exemptions “cannot be reviewed under the Congress review law because the concession granted by the Environmental Protection Agency is not a rule because this term is specific in CRA.”
Justin Sullivan / Getty Emp
Party leaders usually do not contradict the guidance of Parliament. If they do so, they are at risk of their opponents by doing the same when they are in power. “Republicans must walk carefully today,” the leader of the Senate Chic Schumer, a democratic from New York, NPR said Thursday. “Radical Republicans” went to nuclear weapons in the Bases of the Senate. “
“It will not go long before the Democrats return to the driver’s seat again,” Badilla added. “When this happens, all bets will be suspended. Every action that Democrats does not like – whether it is a rule or not – will be a fair game, mining permits and fossil fuel projects to foreign affairs and tax policies.”
Dan Farper, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, Law College, told Grerest that the anxious interpretation of the Senate of CRA means that it can be used to cancel the exemptions from the Ministry of Health and Humanitarian Services that allow the states to amend Medicaid requirements, or broadcast licenses issued by the Federal Communications Committee. The law can also be used to cancel pollution permits granted by the Environmental Protection Agency to countries.
He explained, however, that the Senate canceled only specific exemptions in California that affect the sale of gasoline cars. The rulings in the clean air law that allowed the Environmental Protection Agency not canceled to issue new exemptions, as long as they are not “largely similar” like those canceled. “I think California still has the ability to offer it, and he has the Environmental Protection Agency to agree to the various emissions regulations in the future,” said Farber. “Changing the deadlines may be a few years sufficient.”
California current standards require that 35 percent of new cars that are sold within the state are zero emissions by 2026, which increased 100 percent of new sales by 2035. President Donald Trump. California canceled waiver These regulations were allowed in 2019, during his first term, but this step was challenged in court and the concession was restored by the Biden administration.
Although car manufacturers have previously supported the criteria of air pollution in California, industry groups chanted the vote on Thursday. ” statement The Senate deserves “tremendous credit”.
“The truth is that EV sales were never investigated,” he said. “Car manufacturers have warned against federal and state policy makers that reaching these EV sales will take a miracle, especially in the coming years when the states become totally more strict.”
California Prosecutor Rob Punta objected to the Senate’s vote and pledged to challenge him in court. “Reducing emissions is necessary for prosperity, health and well -being of California and its families,” he said in a statement. The ruler Gavin News said that the decline in the rules of air pollution in his mandate had endangered.CED[ing] The dominance of the American auto industry on China”
