‘Stupid and Dangerous’: CISA Funding Chaos Threatens Essential Cybersecurity Program

In the stampede at eleven o’clock before the expiration of a major contract on Tuesday evening, the CIA and the United States infrastructure renewed its funding for a long -term software tracking project known as the weakness program and joint exposure. It is managed by the CVE program, which is run by the non-profit research and development group, which is a group of global cybersecurity-which provides important data and services for digital defense and research.
Cve program is subject to a council that places Metr -Metr Agenda and priorities to implement it using CISA financing. A CISA spokesman said on Wednesday that the contract with Metrie extends for 11 months. They said in a statement, “Cve program is invaluable for cyberspace and Cisa’s priority,” they said in a statement. “Last night, CISA carried out the option period on the contract to ensure that there is no end in critical CVE services. We are able to patience our partners and the patience of the stakeholders.”
“CISA has set additional financing to preserve programs,” said the Vice President of the Miter and the director of the National Insurance Center, Yosry Barsoum, in a statement on Wednesday. As the hour decreased before this decision appeared, some members of the CVE board announced a plan to transfer the project to a New non -profit An entity called Cve Foundation.
“Since its establishment, the CVE program worked as an initiative funded by the US government, with supervision and administration submitted under the contract. While this structure has supported the growth of the program, it has also sparked long -term concerns among the members of the CVE Council about the sustainability of the only resource that depends on a global level that is linked with one governmental sponsorship,” the Foundation wrote in a statement. “This anxiety has become urgent after a speech on April 15, 2025 from Miter to notify the CVE board of directors that the United States government does not intend to renew its contract to manage the program. While we were hoping that this day would not come, we are preparing for this possibility.”
It is not clear from The current CVE panel He belongs to the new initiative, unlike Kent Landfield, and is a member of the cybersecurity industry long ago that was transferred in the Cve Foundation statement. Cve immediately did not respond to a request for comment.
CISA did not answer questions from WIRED about the reason for the fate of the CVE program in question and whether it was linked to the recent budget discounts sweeping the federal government as imposed on the Trump administration.
The researchers and cybersecurity were relieved on Wednesday that the Cve program had not suddenly stopped exist due to unprecedented instability in US federal financing. Many observers have expressed cautious optimism that the accident can eventually make the Cve program more flexible if it is transmitted to be an independent entity that does not depend on funding from any other government or source.
“The Cve program is very important, and it is in the interest of everyone to succeed,” says Patrick Gary, a security researcher at Vulncheck. “Almost every institution and every security tool depends on this information, and it is not only the United States, it is consumed worldwide. So it is really important to be a service provided by society, and we need to know what to do about this because losing this will be a threat to everyone.”
Federal purchasing records Indicate It costs tens of millions of dollars per contract to run the CVE program. But in the plan Loss that can occur Through one electronic attack that exploits unstable software weaknesses, experts tell wire, operational costs appear small for the benefit of the American defense alone.
Although CISA financing at the last minute, the future of the CVE program is still unclear in the long run. As one source, who asked not to be identified because they are a federal contractor, he put it: “Everything is stupid and very dangerous.”