On Tuesday, the Supreme Court prevented a California federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to rehabilitate thousands of federal workers who were launched and who were in control.
Court Brief The non -profit groups that filed a lawsuit against the chapter have not suffered from a kind of injury that granted them to the prosecution.
The practical consequences of the ruling may be limited, as the other trial judge’s ruling still requires the restoration of many workers himself in place.
Judge Sonia Sotomoor opposed, but she did not provide any reasons. Judge Kitanji Brown Jackson said the court should not rule this important case in the context of the emergency request.
The matter was the latest administrative victory in the Supreme Court in a case emerging from President Trump’s recent raid on executive orders. Like others, though, was technical and principled. The judges said that their request would remain in place while the case was moved forward.
The issue concerned Preliminary It was issued by a federal judge last month in California Administration To return more than 16,000 employees under observation, they opened fire from the Pentagon, the Ministry, Agriculture, Energy, Old Warriors and Internal Administration.
In his rule, Judge William A. Alsib, from the northern province of California, said that “every federal agency has the legal authority to employ and release its employees, even on a large scale, taking into account some guarantees.”
But he wrote that the employee management office, who said he coordinated the termination, had no power to employ and shoot in other agencies.
“However, this is what happened here – collectively,” he wrote.
A committee divided from the American Court of Appeal for the Ninth Chamber, in San Francisco, Refuse Judge ALSUP ordered while the government followed an appeal.
in Emergency application Sarah M. Harris, the Acting Public Prosecutor, that the Supreme Court’s demand for intervention, that federal judges have issued more than 40 temporary applications for restriction or restraint orders to prohibit administration. She said that many of them included judgments that apply to the country.
She wrote that Judge Alsup was a special problem.
Ms. Harris wrote: “The order to restore the exceptional court to the court will violate the authorities, and it is washed into one local court, the executive branches of the employee administration, on the most obvious reasons and the occurrence of time schedules.” “This is not a way to manage a government. This court must stop the constitutional assault on the constitutional structure before more damage occurs.”
responseThe trade unions and the non -profit groups that challenge the shooting said that the administration should not be allowed to carry out that the shooting will be exhausted because this damage was infected in particular.
“While the government complains that reunification of more than 16,000 employees of the six covered agencies is a” enormous “task that would interfere with the agency’s work (without providing evidence to support this confirmation), the competitors’ summary said,” The size of the task is just a reflection of the illegal government scale and “rapid move.”
A different federal judge, James K. Braidar from the Federal Provincial Court in Maryland, as well as last month Administration To restore federal workers in a case brought by 19 states and the province of Colombia. Last week, in Resolution 84 pagesJudge Burder died again in the states, although he restricted his decision to people who live or work in those states and not in 31 others.
The administration has sought to establish this ruling issued by the American Court of Appeal for the Fourth Chamber, which is expected to rule soon.
