Washington – On Thursday, the Supreme Court approved the impact on the increasing controversy over the transgender athletes and decided whether federal law prohibits sexually transformed girls from sports teams in women’s schools.
“The biological boys should not compete for girls’ athletics teams,” said the Prosecutor in West Virginia.
The appeal received support from 26 other countries led by Republicans as well as President Trump.
In recent weeks, Trump has threatened to cut off the education money to California because the transgender athlete participated in a path for women and the field.
Four years ago, Western Virginia adopted the Save Women SPORTS law, but this procedure was banned as discriminatory by the Fourth Circuit Court in Resolution 2-1 Resolution.
Idaho states a similar appeal after its law was banned by the ninth district court in San Francisco. The court said it would hear that case with the West Virginia case.
In the case is the meaning of the ninth title, the Federal Education Law, which was credited with opening the door to the enormous expansion of women’s sports. Schools and colleges have been informed that girls should provide equal opportunities in athletics by providing them with separate sports teams.
However, in the past decade, the states and schools are divided into the question of who can participate in the girls’ team. Are it only those who were girls at birth, or can they also include those whose sexual identity is female?
Virginia Western The court told the court The legislative body found that “the legislative body concluded that biological boys should compete for boys and CO-EDs, but not girls’ teams. This separation is logical, due to the physical differences related to biological males and biological females.”
California and most democratic states allow sexually transgender girls to compete in women’s sports competitions.
In 2013, the Legislative Authority said that the student “is allowed to participate in school programs and activities that are separated from sex, including sports teams and competitions … in line with his sexual identity.”
The Supreme Court has been delayed by a decision on this case, while the gap between the states has grown.
Two years ago, the judges rejected a quick appeal from Western Virginia’s lawyers with a 7-2 vote She allowed the 12 -year -old sexual girl to run over the country through girls a team.
A lawsuit against Beck Biber Jackson and her mother after the school principal said she was prevented under the state law from competing for girls’ teams in her middle school in Brida Gibbport, WW.
She lived as a girl in all aspects of her life for years and receives a treatment to influence adulthood and treatment estrogen, so she did not test (and she will not test) internal puberty, “her mother said to support a lawsuit.
ACLU lawyers said, then the court should stand aside. They said BPJ was keen to participate in sports, but it was “very slow to compete in the events of the path” in the girls’ team.
Last year, Western Virginia tried again and urged the Supreme Court to review the fourth district’s decision and support its restrictions on transgender athletes.
State lawyers also said that possible middle school athletes became a track star.
“This spring, BPJ put the first three places in each event at each event, where BPJ won more than that. BPJ beat more than 100 girls, who displaced them over 250 times while depriving many sites and medals in the conference championship.
Last year, the court first chose the ruling in a Tennessee case to decide whether countries may prohibit adulthood, hormones and other medical treatments for young adolescents who suffer from gender speech defect.
On June 18, the ruling was set aside to the claim that the law reflects the unconstitutional sexual discrimination.
On Thursday, the judges released their final orders before the summer rest, which is given a review of new cases that must be heard in the fall. The western Virginia cases against the Bharatia Jatata and Little Party included Hikox.
In response to appeals, the American Civil Liberties Union attorneys accused a state of seeking to “create a false sense of national emergency” based on “a legal challenge by a sexual transgender girl.”
The lawsuit said that the state management was “part of a concerted effort in the country to target sexually transformed youth for unequal treatment.” The lawsuit claimed that the law violated the ninth title and was unconstitutional because it was discriminated against sports students based on their sexual identity.
Western Virginia lawyers have witnessed a threat to the ninth championship and women’s sports.
They said that the rulings that support the rights of the transgender “have taken a law designed to ensure competitive opportunities for women and girls – based on biological differences – and designed them in a male crane to clarify their way to the sports teams of girls based on identity, and it was supposed to destroy opportunities that aim to protect.”
