“Asserting a right to stash residents”: Appeals court rebukes Trump DOJ’s Abrego Garcia defense

The latest attempt to manage Trump to keep it Approach an error Maryland man Kilmar Abrago Garcia In El Salvadori prison It was transferred to the Federal Appeal Court on Thursday, which increased the legal pressure to facilitate the return of Maryland’s man.

in Thursday’s ruling, The judge of the fourth department court c. Harvey Wilkenson III said that the Trump administration “affirmed the right to rid the population of this country in foreign prisons without the similarity of legal procedures that are the basis of our constitutional order.”

“This must be shocking not only for judges, but to the intuitive feeling of freedom that the Americans are far from the courts are still dear,” Reagan wrote in the opinion of seven pages, joined by other judges.

In response to the Trump administration’s call to stay an order that it “facilitates” the return of Abigo Garcia from El Salvador, the judges called the “extraordinary and bacteria” proposal, with reference to supreme court Take steps.

He added: “While we fully respect the strong executive authority’s affirmation of the authorities of Article Two, we will not manage the efforts made by the senior boycott judge who is trying to implement the recent Supreme Court’s decision.”

supreme court Unanimously With the minimum decision that the federal government must facilitate the return of Abu Garcia, although the judges did not agree to the discovery that federalists should “affect” his return. Legal experts say The Trump administration’s reaction to the ruling can have consequences for the chilling for the Americans and their due rights to procedures.

Although Public Prosecutor Pam Bondi claimed that Abyerigo Garcia is a member of the MS-13 Gang-or Even a high -level leader, Depending on the day you ask – the government was unwilling and unable to provide evidence in any courtroom. The President has made attempts to move away from the case, Claim On Thursday, he “does not participate in it.”

Wilkenson has argued that the internal fighting between the judiciary and the executive authority will only reduce both.

“This is a loser suggestion everywhere. The judiciary will lose many of the continuous edges of the illegal disorder,” he wrote. “The executive authority will lose many public perceptions of non -chaos and all its accompanying enemies. The executive authority may succeed for a while to weaken the courts, but over time, history will call the tragic gap between what was and all that might be, and the law will fall in time.” “