The Left’s War on Women Continues As Montana Judge Blocks Bathroom Bill With Twisted Legal Reasoning – Twitchy
This was not a good week for women, as the left continues its war on the most fair sex in the name of “transit transit” and “inclusive”.
We told you very a little About Stephanie TurnerThe total fencing that was expelled from the competition after that He refused to compete against a manIncluding An exciting statement of fence in the United States And CBS News/AP’s incredibly Sexual address.
Now a judge in Montana temporarily banned HB 121, a draft law that protects women’s bathrooms.
Here is a thread to destroy the ruling, and the logical pastries that this judge used to reach his conclusion.
break. string.
The Montana activist, a very judge, banned the HB 121 bill, which was signed to become a law that protects women’s privacy in the bathrooms.
The logic is amazing. Just wait for this:
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀ (Babybeginner) April 4, 2025
We will notice that the judge is a man.
The judge found that there is no evidence that it protects the woman’s privacy to keep men away from women’s bathrooms!
Um …. Excuse Lee. What does this judge think that a woman wants privacy from? 2/ pic.twitter.com/7hibyopf3o
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀ (Babybeginner) April 4, 2025
Yes, she actually protects women’s privacy.
Women were harassed and recorded in the bathrooms. By men who “definition” as women.
This is a little technician from a legal point of view, but the court finds that the TG case is a suspect category that gets special protection. Why? BC Equal Treatment based on S*X is a basic right.
But the qualitative name is not based on S*X at all !!!!! Talk about mixing concepts. 3/ pic.twitter.com/1P1Yeabs9g
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀ (Babybeginner) April 4, 2025
Sexual converts is to emphasize that sex and sex are liquid and change. This is not a fixed property, which means that it is not protected on the basis of sex.
But the definition of the left and the application of the transgender ideology.
Then the court finds that it violates the right of men to privacy to make people know that they are men walking in a women’s room and that men have a constitutional right to privacy!
(Did your head explode too? 🤯)
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀ (Babybeginner) April 4, 2025
But the judge also said that this does not protect the woman’s right to privacy.
He speaks on my side.
After that, the judge says that the demand of men to stay outside the women’s room worship men’s right to a basic necessity.
Yes. This judge called it a “basic necessity” for some men to use any bath they want.
Basic necessity. 5/ pic.twitter.com/nsgplibmwi
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀ (Babybeginner) April 4, 2025
no.
They can use the men’s room.
Moreover, the judge claims that “Intersex” people do not fit with the definition of the law for males or females, and therefore do not know whether they are allowed to use any of the bathroom!
I have included the definition of you here. 6/ pic.twitter.com/jomjipekan
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀ (Babybeginner) April 4, 2025
This writer asked Groke and here what he said about the spread of people among the real people:
The number of genetically overlapping people – who are born on differences in sex properties (such as chromosomes, gonads, or genitals) depends that are not commensurate with typical definitions of males or females – on how to determine “determinants between the workers”, and experts outperform this. The narrow clinical definition focuses on cases where the gender of chromosomes (for example, XX or XY) does not match the physical appearance or where the genitals are mysterious at birth. The definition of the broadest conditions such as Klinefelter (XXY), Turner syndrome (XO) or congenital adrenal enlargement, even if external features are typical.Using the most stringent clinical definition, the spread of about 0.018 % of the population is estimated. This number comes from studies that focus on clear contradictions between chromosome and developmental sex or mysterious genitals that require a specialized evaluation. For a global population of about 8 billion (as of modern estimates), this translates into about 1.44 million people.
As of July 2024, Montana’s population is 1,137223. This means that the number of people converted in Montana is about 205.
Therefore, Judge Salama and the privacy of nearly half a million women live in Montana for 205 people.
Make it logical.
This is a temporary judicial matter on this bill while the two parties fight it to determine whether the draft law can stand by law.
At the present time, there is no privacy for women in the bathrooms.
The entire order can be found here: https://t.co/qxye30V
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙♀ (Babybeginner) April 4, 2025
This is an insult at all for women, and this happens in a red state.
The left has made it clear that they will ignore the will of the elected legislative body by the origins, the will of the voters, and the safety of women to push their radio -transient agenda in our throat.
Women Party? no.
Editor’s note: Radical left -wing judges do everything in their power to make President Trump’s business to make America great again.
We helped us hold these corrupt judges accountable for their non -constitutional rulings. Join Twitchy VIP And used the promotional code Fight For 60 % of your membership.
