You don’t have to give up Harry Potter to quit J.K. Rowling

I really feel the younger people, who will never be pleased to try the unlimited version of Rolling and its novels. For the millennial generation and the children of General Z like Lee, there was once a golden age where you can only be alert dreams about the day about getting your invitation to Hogwarts without any connections with a full -time transfusion. Now, there A new series of Harry Potter coming to HBORolling is busy distorting her legacy You reach social media about changing legislationAnd we must decide what kind of relationship with the author’s work can be removed for us. I don’t think we must completely give up Harry Potter to resign Rolling (and I don’t think many of us are possible) – but it is complicated. I have a testimony to solve conflict, and I know that when the person you like do with things that you really don’t do, it can create – and must – a moral conflict. But with some of the applicable negotiating tools, we can reach our individual and moral standards to engage with controversial characters and their art.

Transformational mediation is gaining traction in recent years, thanks to its most comprehensive approach, and the accuracy of the conflict – and its understanding of the emotion that is often baked. It differs from the traditional models inspired by the arbitration, as there are ultimately the winners and losers, righteousness and error, with a focus instead on thinking and sympathy to create empowerment results. You can see its distinctive signs in the aspects of reconciliation Friday after the quality of Northern Ireland Relationships, or on how Sarah Sherman was allergic to Amy Lu Wood’s criticism It is the latest scheme of “White Lotus” to solve the problem.

LONDON, England – July 30: JK Rowling attends the press preview of “Harry Potter & the Cursed Child” at the Palace Theater on July 30, 2016 in London, England. (Photo by Rob Stutard/Getti Emiez)

Fluid approach and non -judgment, especially in a dilemma that involves The so -called “cancellation of culture” (Which, by the way, usually only means “not equivalent to bad behavior”), helps us to reconcile our inconsistent approach often in our art and entertainment. It also allows the space to know that other fans have different interests and positions and will make other options. It is easy, for example, to separate from the magic world of Rolling now after my children have grown; It is a different story of someone who has been formed years in his intermediate studies through these novels, or parents whose children are still deep in the ages of Griffandor.

As with other creative artists who have, over time, they revealed a spectrum that ranges between them Population policy to Strange wellness practices to An explicit crimeThe negotiation will differ according to the severity of a person’s actions and the depth of our relationship to work.

There is no correct formula here. The transformational process will invite you to think about the importance of Harry Potter for you, as its Creator behavior stands for your values, and what solutions that you can adhere to are realistic. Because at some point, these books may really miss. Or, someone in your life will ask if you want to watch the new offer with them, or suggest one of the books as a birthday gift for their child.

Rolling is a useful example of the complexity of the fans’ conflict and participation, because its work does not stand alone. If you feel dismayed from its harmful data and procedures, is it separated from the film’s privilege as well, which is also the work of its managers and the members of the actors who spoke against it? Do you choose not to support the sales of its books, but keep the versions you have, or buy used copies that support the local book seller? Will you watch the new HBO series? Will you cancel your subscription? And if you decide that everything related to it is outside the borders now in your life, what are the policies that you will implement with your children Do Do you want to read these books and watch these films?

Michael Gambon attends the great opening of Harry Potter: The exhibition at the Discovery Times Square Center on April 4, 2011 in New York City. (Taylor Hill/Silpmagic/Getty Images)

JK Rowling is not Harry Potter. But the blanket “separate the art from the artist (and its profitable brand) is always an intellectual argument. It means that art exists independently of the person who creates it – and that it can be separated from the person he loves. Given new information, we bear the responsibility for reassessing the work that we care about. But this can run a series, because the things that we care about to form our identity as well. Maybe you were never a fans of R. Kelly in any case. Your relationship with “ignition” does not spoil His crimes. But you may be proud of you Alice Monroe The novels, and Mismanage accusations from her daughter I give you a new discomfort when you look at your book shelf.

All this becomes more difficult, because a major aspect of the dilemma we face with difficult artists is Mali. The more wealth, the more it is in Mountable. The value of JK Rowling is hundreds of millions of dollars, and every procedure puts more money in its huge bank account – its money, with its own words, “Certainly” puts the changing combat groups In the United Kingdom – at least partial support for her behavior. Chris Brown is still wandering Because people are still buying tickets for their offers, and those sales help Pay his sponsorship money. Among the philosophical questions about how some artists are always considered, it will always be a great challenge of moral consumption. That is why it is easier to give the long dead a wider sidewalk – I do not pay for Richard Wagner’s lifestyle to Richard Wagner if I go to see the production of “Parsival”.

I can think so Pablo Picasso and John Lennon He was Abusive and It is transferred Gennika and “Abbey Road,” and Respect that others are approaching their work differently. Periodic people can make great and meaningful things. We cannot pretend otherwise, and we cannot throw a cloak of secret on these things either; It will be a cultural loss if we do so. But what we can do is to be studied around the whereabouts of our money and our interest, and consider creative works in the context of their creators ’behavior. It is a manner and difficult way to look at the world. and Dumbdor He says, it is the choice between what is right and what is easy.