Top 5 phrases TV broadcasters shouldn’t say while covering the Masters

The athlete has live coverage from Round 3 of the Master.
Brandel Chambal, Golf TV analyst, was on BraStool SPORTS earlier this week, and there is a great clip where Chamblee reviews the words or phrases that TV broadcasters are given guidelines about not pronouncing when covering Master. It is replaced by more expressions than heivalotin, which is more on the brand of the event and its organizers in Ugusta National.
Here is the clip:
The broadcasters are not allowed to say “a fan”, “Driving Group”, “Back Nine” and more on the air in the Master ForeplayPod pic.twitter.com/czice7le24
– Parstool SPORTS (Barstoolsports) April 8, 2025
It goes without saying (and this is not reasonable) that an event like a master’s degree will never allow broadcasters to verify other events (it is not Valero Texas open, “it is just” open Texas).
Below are the five who found it more interesting, ranked about their excessively self -appearance:
I cannot say: “a fan”
I can say: “Shepherd”
As Shampli says, there is concern that the “fan” is brief for “fanatic”.
I cannot say: “rough”
I can say: “A second cut.”
For a specific championship on the TV screen by the dulcet tones of Jim Nantz, I get it – the concept of “raw” is not present in a country club – sorry, it’s always the “golf club” – like the National Augusta.
I cannot say: “Sands trap”
I can say: “BUNKER”
Again, the idea of anything in the National Ugosta is not appropriate for being a “trap” at all with his accurate, accurate image.
I cannot say: “Driving”
I can say: “The championship exercise”
“rough?” “trap?” I can at least see the outline of the negative course of negative verbs attributed to the event. Although the range is definitely present for more than just driving, this looks on the brand but is unnecessary.
I cannot say: “Once again nine”
I can say: “Nine second”
It is not that I am preventing one of them on the other, but “Back Nine” is a standard part of the Golf Vernacular to the point that it seems that Ugusta National is just trying to clarify the amount they can get from TV broadcasters.
I asked his colleague Richard Dic if there is any kind of official policy. He said that the source of the industry (given not to be identified because, after all, this is a story about what is not supposed to say) told him that there is no written paper granted to broadcasters, but producers and talents on the air know what Ugosta’s national expectations about how things describe.
(Dottie Peppper: David Cannon / Getty Images)