Tottenham Hotspur intend to sue Man United owners Ineos for £11 million
More details appeared on Premier League competitors, Tottenham Hotspur, prosecuting Manchester United Companions, INEOS.
The Red Devils need to raise money through sales this summer to implement the intensive work in the team required by director Robin Amorim.
Malcon has already implemented many cost reduction options, such as setting tours in place Job losses In all club sections.
For example, they recently cut Scout Section From 100 to 10 people try to simplify the process.
However, this cost of costs recently suffered from a setback where Tottenham threatened To prosecute Club owners to violate the contract.
The Times Reports that Spears had “submitted a claim to the Supreme Court on unpaid care fees. The dispute involves a five -year deal, at a value of 17.5 million pounds.”
The report adds that “the court documents show that Tottenham claims that INEOS failed to pay a batch less than 500,000 pounds in August last year, and in December, it paid 5.1 million pounds for the 2025-26 season.”
A five -year sponsorship agreement was signed in 2022, which witnessed the company Ineos Automotive Callsor, and it has the name of the company at the back of the seats on the bench at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.
The deal also witnessed the company’s ads that were shown on large screens in Matches and SAR Grenadier, which was the club’s official vehicle’s partner 4 x 4.
However, INEOS ended this partnership in March, but Tottenham feels upset with the situation. In general, “Spears seeks a little more than 11 million pounds from INEOS-5.5 million pounds for last year last year, another 5.3 million pounds for the 2026-27 season, and the last year of the original care deal, in addition to 300,000 pounds.”
It is clear that INEOS defended themselves and called, “they had a contractual right” to end their relationship early and also stated that it is “quite normal” that partnerships be reviewed at regular intervals.
United will be keen to win Inos in their case because they will be terrified of any other money that is removed from the efforts of the first team to improve the transportation market.
Distinctive image Michael Reagan via Getty Images