Anger and condemnation erupted as families, lawyers and immigrant preachers who absorbed the explosion from the last bomb dumped by Trump’s migration – A travel ban, which stops or restricts people from 19 African, Asian and Caribbean countries from entering the United States.
While the Trump administration said that the travel embargo is aimed at maintaining the safety of the Americans, critics have canceled the accusations of discrimination, cruelty, racism, inhumane, and more. Meanwhile, the news also spoke about what will happen as soon as the ban on Monday is easy.
“This travel embargo is a racist, fanatic attack, foreigners and non-American transit in depth human rights-as we have been persecuted.
“It is clear that this administration has something against the immigrants, and it has something against us in particular,” said Jose Antonio Kulina, a former Lieutenant for the Venezuelan army who fled to Miami in 2003 and head of the VIPEX organization. “We are involved. We were persecuted by the tyranny of Nicholas Maduro and we are persecuted by the Donald Trump administration.”
He said, 38 -year -old Haiti Card, who was very afraid to allow her name to be used, and other others in society feel “confused and fear” about the ban on Haiti. She said that most of her family live there, including her sister and her father, the patient. “They came all the time to visit and now I don’t know if they’ll be able to do so,” she said, adding that she heard that there were exceptions to the ban but were not sure.
There are some exceptions, including for people with legal permanent residence, couples and children of American citizens, and those adopted and others.
“But if you are a pair of permanent resident, I forgot the matter,” said Doug Rand, former director of Citizenship and Immigration Services during the Biden administration. He said that he would also affect other relatives, such as adult children and siblings from the permanent legal population, and the people who won the lottery of diversity or under the auspices of an American employer who are from the listed countries.
In Havana, he learned a waiting list from people outside the American embassy, news of traveling and commenting while waiting for their visas interviews.
“I was waiting for nine years for this moment,” said a young woman in the queue. She and others said that the comment means the inability to visit the family or escape from the terrible conditions in Cuba.
“If they do not give visas, the Cubans will starve, given the situation, they will starve,” said Ismail Ghaneza, a retired Cuban. “I see this measure bad, I see it bad because the situation is difficult and we have to stay alive.”
Trump is forbidden to announce Wednesday night from 12 countries from traveling to the United States.
In seven other countries, travel to the United States was suspended but not banned. They are Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.
Sheen Karim, the administrative lawyer of Hafeey & Karim Law Law, said that although it is in the field of immigration law, it carries “republics’ views” on this issue, and agreed to have a need for a more strict immigration policy and a more comprehensive examination.
Karim said: “I know that the White House presented some explanations about the reason for each of these countries, but I can only feel the extreme targeting, as he is a lawyer for Islamic migration.” “The countries are the majority of the Muslim, unfortunately.”
The ban can be a “arduous battle”
Immigration advocates said that unlike the previous Trump travel ban, which brought them out of them, they expect the president to enact a similar policy during his second term. Trump banned for 2017 immediately preventing Muslims from entering the country, Leave some of their ways in airports or unable to ride flights.
But like its previous ban, the effect of the current prohibition will feel next week by people trying to combine families, and those who have a job in the United States, who have made planning or planned visits, and who planned to study here or were looking for a cultural exchange.
It took three Trump’s attempts by Trump, in his previous administration, to reach a travel ban accepted by the US Supreme Court. The lower courts installed them in the first edition and the administration continued to review it until the Supreme Court accepted its third edition in June 2018. Migration and civil rights groups opposed all three publications.
Rahha Walla, the deputy head of the strategy and partnerships at the National Center for Immigration Law, said that the challenge of the last embargo “will be an arduous battle” because the Supreme Court’s decision is the land law.
Edward Kochia, a lawyer for immigration in New York City, said that preventing the last ban may be more difficult now in 2017.
He said, “Trump has become more intelligent this time,” explaining that the mixture of countries makes it difficult to say that the ban is discriminatory.
Also, the implementation will not be surprising and the argument that the individual countries do not examine the documents of their citizens well in court, according to Kochia.
However, the vast effects of affected people are not a security threat.
“What will this mean for family unification? There are many countries here!” Kochia said. “Then, there are people who may have commercial transactions, and people who want to make investments here in the United States or come to temporary work visas, student visas or even for a visit … this seems to have left the window.”
He called out the prohibition – that the exaggeration visa in the nutrition is a threat to national security and the inability to fully examine passengers in a visa in those countries – “fig paper”.
He said that if there is a gap in the audit, “this deserves to take a look at it,” but he added that “all kinds of people have passed their visas – and because someone has passed their visa and committed a crime, we only have to escape from this feeling of guilt through the concept of the association.”
For Wala, the newly announced ban on the President’s policies and data cannot be separated.
He said, “This ban began as a president saying that he will have a complete and comprehensive closure of Muslims in the country. He also said that he wanted to ban people-and forgive the French here-from the hole countries.”
In Miami, Colina said he was happy that the ban will prevent the officials of the Maduro regime in Venezuela and their families “who always find a way” to obtain a visa to enter the country, but they are a minority, and the partial ban will negatively affect the largest society and it is not fair. “
