DP. Jae Bhatershaya is President Trump’s choice to lead the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which was traditionally the greatest fun of biomedical research in the world.
On March 5, a professor of health policy at Stanford will face questions from the Health, Education and Pensions Committee in the Senate as he tries to emphasize the leadership of one of the most powerful health agencies in the country.
Here is what to know about Bahtasharia.
He is the son of immigrants
Bhutchariya was born in Kolkata, India and said in a Podcast interview His mother came from the slums, while his father, an electrical engineer, was part of the middle class in the country. In the 1970s, his family migrated to the United States, and first settled in Massachusetts and then in California, outside Los Angeles. When he was 18 years old, Bhattacharlya turned from Hinduism into sheikhs.
He is interested in a health economy
BHATTACHARYA got four degrees in Stanford: Bachelor’s degree, Master, PhD in Medicine, and PhD. He worked as an economist at Rand before returning to Stanford to join faculty members.
Bhattacharlya has discussed a health economy, studied the residents of the United States, and analyzed how the country’s health care system affects the health of these groups.
It carries controversial views on Covid-19
During the epidemic, Bhattacharlya became a familiar and contradictory expert in this disease, as he conducted many interviews and published the two articles on what he felt was the reaction of public health officials of the virus. Based on the data he saw, it was believed that Covid-19 was more moderate than health experts-including those in the government-made it out, and claimed that Covid-19 tests were just taking severe cases and people who developed symptoms, while there were more injured people but had no symptoms. “There are many people wandering with evidence of Covid infection that will not be counted because they do not appear to the doctor; he said in 2020,” They have a relatively moderate infection. ” Podcast.
In March 2020, he participated in his controversial authorship Editorial in Wall Street GurnaFor which locks were interrogated. “The global quarantine may not deserve the costs imposed on the economy, society, mental and individual physical health,” he wrote. “We must take immediate steps to assess the experimental basis of current locks.”
Read more: RFK JR. Bitta vaccine amid out exacerbation
He also participated in writing the Great Barrington in October 2020, an open message argued to stop the lock. Instead, the message preferred to allow people at risk of Covid-19 to communicate with their daily lives, assuming that if they have infection, they will suffer from a mild disease and contribute to building the herd immunity that will eventually protect the population.
Politics critics have indicated that the strategy will continue to be at risk of those most vulnerable to the development of complications from the disease, such as the elderly and those who suffer from weakening of the immune system.
It is too Opposition Careful mandate in schools. In 2021, he participated in writing an article that argues that “the benefits of masks in preventing serious death from Covid-19 among children are unlimited, and that” Covid-19 does not represent a threat to children from incidents or common influenza “. Receive death threats To express them.
Challenge in the National Institutes of Health
If confirmed, BHATTARAYA will head an agency at a crossroads. Under Trump’s administration, at the National Institutes of Health It changed its policy in issuing research grants For institutions, determining the amount they will pay for only 15 % of the total grant (unlike 30-70 % or more). The federal judge has remained temporarily on the new policy, but BHATTARAYA will be responsible for moving in any transformations in the policies and reforms of the agency’s grants (which many scholars approved) to make the national information institutes more efficient.
Some experts say that his medical certificate and the understanding of health data ReportsSome people are concerned about their interpretation of these data, which they believe can lead to misleading conclusions. “I prefer to see him more than others, because I believe that if he is not appointed, it is likely that anyone else helps him worse.” Stat said.
