President Donald Trump Ministry of Justice It seeks to cancel the case of the Supreme Court in an attempt to give the president greater control over three -letter agencies.
In a move that could allow Trump to shoot more easily on the implementation of his policies, the American Attorney General of Democratic Senator Dick Durbin sent him to notify him of the Ministry of Justice’s plans for the Supreme Court request to flip a major precedent limiting the authority’s authority to remove the independent agency members.
The letter, which was formulated by the Attorney General Sarah Harris, says that the Ministry of Justice has decided that “some of the provisions of removal for the reasons” that apply to some members of the administrative agency are unconstitutional, and that the administration “no longer defends their constitutionality.”
Humphrey, the executor against the United States, the relevant case, in 1935 The case of the Supreme Court The constitutional authority of the president has narrowed the removal of the executive branch agents.
Earlier this month, a former NLRB member filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump for its termination, on the pretext that federal law protects her from its arbitrary rejection. (Ivan Fuction/AP)
Harris was martyred with a previous case, Maires against the United States, who saw that the constitution gave the only president to remove the executives officials.
Harris wrote in the letter: “The exception recognized in the perpetrators of Humphrey is not commensurate with the main officers who head the regulatory committees mentioned above.”
“To the extent that the Humphrey port requires otherwise, the administration intends to urge the Supreme Court to cancel this decision, which prevents the president from overseeing the main officials of the executive authority who implement the laws on behalf of the president, which was already the erosion of Harris.
Durbin described the message as “an amazing reflection of the position of the Ministry of Justice for a long time under Republican presidents and Democrats alike,” in a statement in favor of Fox News Digital. He added that the request “is not surprising from the administration that is only looking for the wealthy special interests – not the American people.”
However, conservative legal theorists supported the Trump administration’s step, on the pretext that the closure of the Hamfari port would approach the federal government to the original intent of the constitution lamps. Trump has significantly introduced his presidential campaign against former President Joe Biden as a competition between the “deep state” and democracy, saying at that time, either we have a deep state or have democracy. The other.
“Congress makes laws the president’s duty to implement these laws and enforce them under the unified executive theory,” Hans von Spacovsky, a senior legal colleague at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital. “This means that the president, because he is president Executive AuthorityHe has full control of the executive branch, and this includes the employment and release of both in the executive branch, and most importantly, and most importantly, the heads of all different offices and departments within the executive branch. “
The American lawyer, the Democratic Chargé d’Affaire of Illinois Dorbin, sent him to notify him of the plans of the Ministry of Justice to demand the Supreme Court to cancel a major precedent that limits the president’s authority to remove the independent agency members. (AP Photo/Mark Schiesfelbein)
Von Spacovsky says that the exception carved by the court in the perpetrators of Humphrey “does not apply to these federal agencies.” In its letter, Harris specifically mentioned the Federal Trade Committee (FTC), the National Labor Relations Council (NLRB) and the Consumer Product Safety Committee (CPSC).
Earlier this month, a former member of NLRB A lawsuit against Trump After completing it, on the pretext that federal law protects it from its arbitrary rejection. The Trump administration has also become a target for various other lawsuits that involve the rejection of federal employees.
“My opinion about what is going on with the Trump agenda at the present time is that they are moving to reach the level of the Supreme Federal Court, including the Supreme Court, to pressure this type of question only,” Ronald Petto, Dean of Graduate Studies and Professor of Politics at Helsdale College , Fox News Digital.
Petrto says that some of the administration’s actions “contradict the current civil service law and the current protection, for example, against the removal of NLRB Commissioners.”
Thus, the true story of the tape will be when these initial rulings are appealed the appeal ladder, and eventually even the Supreme Court, which certainly has many judges who I think he understands the second article of the constitution properly and may be open to Pisto and said: “Reconsidering Humphrey “. (Doulieryafp photography via Getty Images)
“It is clear that they know that they will lose much of that at the lower court level. They want to pay them to the Supreme Court, because they believe that they may get a reconsideration,” Petrtoto said. .
Von Spacovsky stated that independent agencies are “indisputable” as a result of the Hamfari port, saying, “You make them responsible for voters by returning them to the place they belong to, and he is under the authority of the president.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
Trump’s lawyer is likely to lose in the lower court, as the judges are expected to apply the precedent of the Supreme Court in their decisions. But despite this, the Trump administration can appeal higher and higher to try to get the Supreme Court review, as the Hamfrey port can be canceled.
“[Democrats] They will often win, first and foremost, because they know that it is easy to judge judges in sympathetic provinces. The second number, the provincial judges will go mainly by the current Supreme Court precedent. The court, which definitely has many judges who I think they understand the second article of the constitution and may be open for Humphrey. “
