Trump administration accuses judge of ‘unprecedented defiance’ of Supreme Court in immigration dispute
WASHINGTON – A battle over the fate of a group of immigrants that the Trump administration wants to deport to southern Sudan was exposed to Tuesday, where the Ministry of Justice accused a federal judge “an unprecedented challenge” of the Supreme Court’s decision the previous day.
Public Attorney d. John Sawir I made a movement In the Supreme Court seeks to obtain a clarification Monday evening decision That raised restrictions at the country level on the administration’s ability to send Immigrants to the “third countries” have no connection.
The transition from the Trump administration comes as the government itself was accused of violating the orders of the court, including the judge who deals with the deportation case, the American boycott judge in Massachusetts, who was subjected to hard shooting from the Maga world.
Immediately after the Supreme Court, Murphy said in the introduction of the list that he did not believe that the judges prevented his order on May 21, which prevented men from sending to South Sudan.
The detainees are currently being held at an American facility in Djibouti. Prosecutors say that all eight are subject to Murphy, although only six were mentioned in his decision in May.
Murphy’s understanding was that the Supreme Court only prevented his previous ruling, which determines the rules at the country level, which gives those who were affected by a “meaningful opportunity” to take the allegations that they would be at risk of torture, persecution or death if they were Send to the countries The administration has concluded deals to receive migrants who were deported.
The Supreme Court itself did not explain its decision and did not specify any of the Murphy rulings that were banned. But liberal justice, Sonia Sotomoor, who wrote an opposition opinion, said she did not believe that Murphy’s decision on May 21 was affected.
Sauer now wants to explain the Supreme Court exactly what it means. He also suggested that the court could fully expel Murphy.
He wrote in the new deposit: “The ruling of the boycott court last night is a defiance without a law that disrupts sensitive diplomatic relations again and strikes the brakes on the executive legal efforts of the impact of the removal operations in the third country.”
“This court must immediately clarify that the provincial court enforcement matter has no effect, and to put a rapid end to the continuous damage that cannot be repaired to the executive branch and its agents, who remain under an unfounded threat of contempt as they are forced to house the dangerous criminal foreigners at a military base in the century of Africa who are now lying to the borders of the regional conflict.”
Lawyers are expected to submit to migrants in response to the file of the Ministry of Justice quickly.
In an interview with Fox News on Monday evening, the White House Chief of Staff Policy, Stephen Miller, examined more procedures on this issue.
Miller said: “The local court judge in Boston said he will challenge the Supreme Court ruling,” Miller said. “Firefighters are expected tomorrow when we take this judge responsible for refusing to obey the Supreme Court.”
