The Trump administration has suspended one billion dollars for mental health services for children, saying that the programs funded by the Law of the two parties aimed at regulating armed violence in schools are no longer in the interest of the federal government.
The lawmakers authorized the money in 2022 after a former student opened a primary school in Uvalde, Texas, killing 19 children and two teachers and wounding 17 others. This measure, known as the Safety Law of the two parties, Breaking a dead end for decades Between Republicans and Democrats in Congress on dealing with armed violence by greatly focusing on improving the mental health support for students.
As some of the mental health programs started, the Ministry of Education canceled funding this week and informed the granting recipients that they will have to submit the application for money due to the possible violations of the federal civil rights law.
The administration has not determined the civil rights law or providing beneficiaries of grants with any evidence of violations, according to the notice reviewed by the New York Times.
A spokeswoman for the Ministry of Education confirmed that the grants have stopped due to the focus in particular on increasing the diversity of psychologists, consultants and other mental health workers.
“Under defective priorities deeply for the Biden administration, beneficiaries of the grants used funding to implement sweat -based procedures such as employing classes in methods that have nothing to do with mental health and can harm students with the grants that are supposed to help,” said Maadi Pederman, Deputy Assistant Minister in Communications. “We owe American families to ensure that taxpayers dollars support evidence -based practices and really focus on improving the mental health of students.”
Mrs. Pederman refused to submit requests that are considered discriminatory management, noting the privacy laws. Instead, she provided examples of specific provisions that were withdrawn from long applications.
Select a item in one of the “targets of diversity” to employ eight non -white consultants out of a total of 24 years. A line in an additional application included training on mental health professionals who included helping the advisers to “identify systematic injustice and challenge, Iranian anti -Iranians, and treat white superiority to support distinguished communities in terms of ethical.”
The most prominent importance of dealing with “racist stress and shock” for students. The training providers guarantee an understanding of “the effects of racism and white concession in the practice of education.”
The cancellation of the grant was I mentioned earlier by Associated Press.
Senator Christopher S. said. Murphy, a democratic in Connecticut who helped negotiate the legislation, is illegal to stop any financing head accredited by Congress and called on Republican supporters to defend the law. Three Republican Senators, John Corn from Texas, Susan Collins from Min and Tom Telese from North Carolina, who wrote a column to support the law three years ago, wanted an invitation to get the comment.
“I am raw about this because I sat in the room for a long time to negotiate a sensitive compromise on a very difficult issue,” said Mr. Murphy in an interview. “What is the goal of being in Congress and writing laws if the president can only ignore them? Therefore, I am angry that my Republican partners do not raise objections to what the president does.”
Christopher Rovo, the conservative activist who led the attack on the critical race theory and its diversity, has published stock and integration programs this week from some grant requests, which he said was evidence that the program was “used for racist progress between the left and discrimination.”
“No more clay box for activists under the guise of mental health,” Mr. Rovo books.
But Mary Wall, the former Deputy Minister of Education for Education Participated in Create the process to request bids for the program under the Biden Administration, said that she was a “particle” to equal mental health services with the extremism of children.
She said that the application process prefers programs that reflect the societies they served. For example, programs that aim to train mental health professionals are often received, for example, an additional study if they can show how to direct training to professionals with similar wallpapers. Mrs. Wall said this was a “sound practice” with proven results.
“One of the first questions after every one shooting is whether the student has received mental health support and services,” said Ms. Wall. “It is not an extended to say that getting rid of this support provides the risk of harm to school societies and students.”
