Trump administration gives schools deadline to cut DEI or lose federal funds | Trump administration

the Trump administration It gives schools and universities in the United States two weeks to the judiciary Diversity initiatives Or risk losing federal funds, raising risks in the president’s battle against “sadness”.

On Friday note, the Ministry of Education gave a warning to stop using “racist preferences” as an admission, financial aid, employment, or other fields. Schools They are granted 14 days to end any practice of students or workers differently because of their race.

Faculties in all parts of the country were rushing to assess their risks and determine whether the practices they believed to be legal would be defended. The comprehensive demand threatens to raise all aspects of campus operations, from articles on college’s requests to classroom lessons and campus clubs.

It is supposed to correct what the memo described as a discrimination in education, and often against white and Asian students.

“Schools work on an excuse that the choice of students for” diversity “or similar talisman does not choose them based on race,” said Craig Treenor, Assistant Minister of Civil Rights. “It is no longer. Students must be evaluated according to the entitlement, achievement and personality.”

The guidelines sparked a violent reaction from civil rights groups and university groups. Some believe that its mysterious language aims to have a chilling effect, and to pressure schools to eliminate anything that touches the issue of race even if it is defense in court.

“Creating a feeling of dangers about doing work that may enhance various universities and welcome more than just a clear statement of the current law,” said Jonathan Vanmith, the first vice president of government relations at the American Education Council. College Presidents Association.

The memo is an extension Donald TrumpExecutive matter prohibits diversity, fairness and integration programs. As a legal justification, he cited the Supreme Court’s decision for the year 2023, which prohibits race as a factor in admission to the college.

“Simply put, educational institutions may not separate students or separate them on the basis of race, and interest or burdens are not distributed on the basis of race,” he said.

The Ministry of Education announced on Monday that it had reduced $ 600 million of grants to organizations that train teachers. The administration said that the programs promoted the concepts of “division” such as Dei, critical race theory and social justice activity.

The confusion about the effects of Trump’s anti -control order was clear in a confirmation session last week for the Minister of Education candidate Linda McMahon. When asked if the lessons about the history of African Americans would contradict Trump’s order, McMahon said it was not sure.

Troy Flint spokeswoman said that the California Schools Association is awaiting legal guidance so that she can advise schools on the date of the Trump administration.

He said: “At this stage, there is not enough information for the playing book step by step that tells the educational areas if you do so after that, you must do B, or perhaps remove the program completely completely.” I know people want this granular level of details. But this is a new era, with some new civil rights theories and there is no final sign of what is happening now. “

The new guidance takes the goal directly to admission to the college, indicating that the colleges have sought to work around the Supreme Court decision.

The guidance says that college articles, for example, cannot be used to predict the student race. In the decision of the Supreme Court, the head of the judges John Roberts Nothing prevented from preventing colleges “from looking at the applicant’s discussion on how race affects his life”, although he warned that colleges could not use articles as indirect to consider student race.

The memorandum also said that it is illegal to colleges to eliminate the requirements of the unified test “to achieve a racist balance required or to increase racial diversity.” Dozens of colleges throughout the United States have dropped the requirements of SAT and ACT in recent years, noting that the exams prefer students from high -income families.

Angel Barez, CEO of the National Association for Admission, said that practices that have long been common can become legal obligations, including employment in the areas represented incomplete or purchase of potential students who have certain academic and demographic information.

“The colleges and universities will find the same between a rock and a difficult place,” Peres said. “They know that what they do is not illegal, but they are concerned that if they do not comply, the lack of federal financing will lead to their occurrence.”

Some universities said they expect a little change. At Origon State University, a legal review concluded that its programs are “fully compatible with all governmental and federal laws,” according to a message from Rob Odum, Vice President of University Relations and Marketing.

The department’s note seems to be aimed at scholarships for students from certain racist backgrounds. There was a legal debate about whether the Supreme Court’s decision extends to financial aid, as some schools and institutions decided to cancel the ethnic requirements for some scholarships.

The National Financial Aid Assistance said to students that there is no consensus on the question, and the group tries to understand how the memo can affect students.

“The last thing that students need when plans on how to pay the college price is the uncertainty about when or whether they would receive the financial aid they were depending on,” the group said in a statement.

Trump has called for the elimination of the Ministry of Education, and the “government competence management” that Illon Musk (DOGE) has reduced dozens of contracts that are considered a waste.

The Dog team won a legal victory on Monday when a federal judge refused to prevent him from federal loan records. The judge said that the prosecutor, the Student Association at the University of California, failed to prove that she was harmed by Dog’s access to data.