The $ 60 billion US foreign aid budget was set at $ 15 million in the ocean.
literally. Funds paid for projects in the Pacific Island countries to help them overcome the high levels of sea surfaces caused by climate change.
Many American taxpayers may think this was just good and unrelated expenses.
Why did we write this
Focus a story
Temporary freezing in US foreign aid, which has planted confusion and panic among American aid agencies and foreign beneficiaries alike, re -again, in a competitive world, which helps Washington itself by helping others.
But the budget line point was not charitable. Rarely with external aid. The primary purpose was to continue a long-term strategic goal-in this case, facing China’s increasing domination by making the United States a reliable partner in the selection in the region.
Thousands of these projects funded by the United States around the world-from the anti-terrorism projects in the Horn of Africa have left to the Small Business Development programs in Central America-in order to have been forgotten since Foreign Minister Marco Rubio freezes external aid and issued orders to stop working in the projects funded by the agency American International Development.
Minister Rubio said on January 24 that he was launching a full review of the budget of US foreign aid – the largest in the world – to be in line with President Donald Trump’s foreign policy “America”.
The matter was cultivating confusion and panic among the employees of the American government aid agencies and foreign beneficiaries of aid – with some in the public health warning that the souls would be lost due to the sudden pieces.
By Tuesday, Secretary Rubio issued a waiver of exempting life -saving humanitarian aid from freezing aid.
“Good week for Russia and China”
However, many experts warn that even a temporary stop in external assistance programs is likely to have long -term effects on American interests.
In a world of great power, they say that any movements that harm America as a reliable partner in the great power will enhance the possibilities of the main competitors of Washington.
“This was a very good week for Russia and China,” says John Atrman, Senior Vice President of Global Security and Geosrattegy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. “Suddenly, the perception is that the United States government is the main bulk of risk around the world, and this can only encourage countries to search elsewhere for stability and partnerships,” he says.
“I cannot imagine that China and Russia will not try to benefit from this,” he added.
The departments received from external aid reviews. Unusual, on the other hand, closing all external assistance pending a period of months.
“This” stop and take a look ” [review] “Instead of” maintaining it while taking a look, “says a former Republican Congress employee, who asked not to be identified by speaking publicly:” Instead of “keeping it while taking a look,” which was generally the approach before.
This difference “led to the reaction of the sky that we see now, but at the end of the day I think the horror mode will be more than the actual influence orders,” a former specialist in overseeing external aid says.
Charity for the basic American interests
The former employee says that many international agencies and NGOs have already received funding to see them by stopping. The Biden administration has downloaded some financing in anticipation of this type of procedure.
But it is the long -term and reliable programs in Washington that build good intentions and confidence, as people say in the aid sector. Some experts cite one example of the President’s Emergency Emergency Plan. President George W. Bush has started the HIV/AIDS virus program and has been preserved by every president since then.
Dr. Atirman, who has been ultimately served in the employees of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs policies, says that such initiatives are not ultimately charitable programs. Without exception, they serve the basic American interests by enhancing strategic goals and enhancing American values in a world of competition.
“The United States is not the world charitable bank, but when we help governments improve the lives of its people, with the passage of time it improves the lives of Americans as well,” he says.
If Pepfar reduces the number of AIDS cases in Africa, he says, this ultimately reduces the number of cases in the United States – and saves American spirits. (On Wednesday, the United States abdicated the order to stop financing Pepfar, at least temporarily.)
Dr. Atirman believes that all kinds of aid programs have similar effects. “You can say that the United States -funded water projects in Jordan helped maintain Jordan’s stability. This in turn helps to preserve Israel safe, which was the United States’ policy and the strategic goal of decades.”
Keep the “aura effect”
Some aid recipients say “losers” after the review. “But this is not different from reviewing any other administration.”
Some external aid experts say that the initiatives that have been explained as enhancing the rights of LGBTQ+ or immigration in any way are likely to be destroyed.
As for China, former Congress employee says there are vulnerable reasons for the increasing effect of Beijing, but the review of US foreign aid is not one of them.
“If Beijing has a greater impact on providing 5 % of the budgets of some United Nations agencies for United Nations libraries than 25 %, it is appropriate to ask about this and evaluate how to change this,” says the former employee.
Dr. Altiman is less worrying, worrying that any harm to Washington will play in the hands of its opponents.
“There is an aura effect that happens because the United States helps people all over the world lead a better and healthy life,” he says.
“If China is considered a person who reliably assisting governments and helping people to lead a better life, while the United States wanders in governments and gets away from people,” he adds, adding: “It will inevitably have an impact – and perhaps one of them we do not want.”
.jpg?w=390&resize=390,220&ssl=1 "Two New Yorker Films Receive 2025 Oscar Nominations")
