Current Affairs

Trump is turning the media into a mouthpiece of the regime | Lawrence Douglas

YYou know that we are in trouble when Fox News appears as a great defender for freedom of the press. But this was the case when Jacoy Heinrich, the great political correspondent of Fox, responded to the news that the White House of Trump will now formulate journalists who get the president in small environments, with the position: “This step does not return strength to people – it gives power to the White House.” Heinrich was specifically responding to the claim of press secretary Caroline Levitit Orwellian to allow Donald Trump Choose who would have covered him as a designer to restore power “return to the American people.”

The fruits of the new policy were rich in the sick scene that was revealed in the Oval Office last week. If the president and JD Vance are shameful Volodymyr Zelenskyy It was not bad enough, there was the unprecedented role that the “press” played in the unpleasant drama.

Here I do not refer simply to the incendiary Brian Glen’s demand that the leader of a war-torn country justify his decisions-less than a question of provocation, which was an introduction to the agency that followed. Trump seemed winking in Gilin, a true voice correspondent of America, a newly listed right cable channel in the press gathering, which led to speculation that the question of Glenn had been pre-stated, which is reasonable speculation-meaning, why not? – And not related.

When or not, these are the types of questions that we must expect when serious journalists are replaced by the veins resulting from the system, which is the dolls who play the role of government propaganda in the curtain of the reports. Glen, whose history dates back to Major Taylor Green and describes himself as “100 % behind President Trump”, claims that the truck is not in the theories of the right-wing extremist conspiracy-while he insists that Jant January was like an order Antifa has been classified within the job And that the vast fraud mechanism costs Trump in the 2020 elections.

But before Glin managed the Ukrainian president, he had a previous question to Trump: “Mr. President, [do] In the end, you think your legacy will be the peacemaker, not the president who led this country to another war …? “In the circumstance of the inquiry, this broadcast gave Trump the opportunity for poetic wax:” I hope to remember as a peacemaker … I do this to save lives more than anything else … Thank you, Brian, for this question. It was a great question. “

But we did not do with Paeans to the great peace maker. I was not affirmed Zelinski Glenn, that he would wear a suit as soon as the war ended. We received this question: “Kiir Starmer has praised … your courage and condemnation to lead … What gave you the moral courage and condemnation to move forward and leadership?”

In the properly operating press weapon, we may have expected the question to be directed at Zelenskyy, which, with the exceptional stability and design, led a war against the cruel aggressor. But no. The question was asked to Trump, who replied, “A boy, I love this man. Who are you with?” The answer was one of the American news, another network that works to the far right of Fox, and trafficking in conspiracy theories and committed to fixed support from the Maga policy – as well as a beneficiary of the White House leadership in its journalism group.

Once again, Trump has become almost sad – “I love the question … it’s a very good question” – before blame for Russia’s invasion of Russia Ukraine Hamas’s attack on Israel on Joe Biden. From there, as we have seen, things became more clear, but they were lost in the infectious and traditional treatment of Zelinski, especially in the hands of Vans (“Did you say thank you once, this entire meeting?”) Was the quality of Pyongyang-Sque from the billiards who are chosen in Trump that you do not use, but unprecedented.

At the same time, the Associated Press has been prohibited from the historical meeting, as it continues to call a group of water that is entirely outside the judicial term by the name it carried since the sixteenth century.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button