UK charities urge ministers to stop scapegoating nature for planning failures | Planning policy

Charitable societies of nature and combined membership are pressure from about 8 million people on the Prime Minister and the advisor to stop the demonic life of wildlife and enhance environmental protection in new planning laws.

Inviting organizations that are home names, such as RSPB, National Trust and Trusts Trust Infrastructure and infrastructure bill To finish what they say is the natural scapegoat for the failure of the planning system. They say that the anti -nature speech is used by Rachel Reeves and Kiir Starmer, Which described environmental exhibitions as “blockers”, Unlike general feelings.

A Yogov poll revealed by the groups that 71 % of the public will support increased protection of green and blue spaces, including fields, forests, societal parks, national parks, rivers, lakes and currents.

MPS organizations urge to support the amendments to tightening environmental protection in the draft law because they are going through their second reading on Monday, including adding strict rules that environmental benefits should greatly outweigh from development and a legal duty to avoid harm to protected wildlife where possible.

Matt Brown said from Wildlife trust.

The draft law may mean that home builders and developers can ignore environmental regulations for individual projects and instead they pay the national nature restoration tax. Some critics have named this reflection of the pollutant pushing a principle to a bush system for pollution.

The leaders of nature organizations have worked closely with the ministers in an attempt to ensure rivers and dishes Unique fresh water habitats It is mostly in the south and east of England – and threatened species such as Dormice, OTERS and Badges, to be preserved in the new planning bill. However, they say confidence has been broken between ministers and charities.

Richard Pinwell, CEO of Wildlife and the Ruvi Link, a collection of umbrella for more than 80 charities, said planning changes can shake the foundations of environmental law in England. “After months of the major ministers of the ram of nature, confidence is a thin straw. To rebuild confidence and understand opportunities, the days of the demonic life of the wildlife must end,” he said.

“The government must work quickly to amend the bill, support guarantees for the most expensive wildlife in the United Kingdom, and to ensure that the planning system is positive for nature, with every development of design.”

Charitable societies say that any new law must respect the main environmental rules that should avoid damage whenever possible and always avoid when the damage is not flammable. They added that legal tests in the draft law that the benefits of nature should “exceed” the harm from development is very weak.

The government says that the new planning rules will unleash the “construction boom” because it seeks its goal of 1.5 million new homes by the end of this parliament. He – she He says It will “replace[e] Current systems for environmental evaluation to provide a more effective and simplistic system that reduces the costs and delay of developers, while still protects the environment. “

Reeves has repeatedly incited nature against growth, saying that the government will cut the red tape R.“Focus on building things, and stop worrying about bats and Nights”.

“Environmental regulations protect the species that we cherish as a nation – whether it is the pulp, butterflies, or hedgehogs. We agree that the regulations can improve and should be improved if the housing is built on the proposed scale,” said Hillary McGradi, General Manager of National, which includes more than 5 million members.

“But the vital guarantees that the regulations provide for nature should not be reduced, and the quality of people’s lives should not be reduced or considered rejected by it.”

“We are in the middle of nature and the climatic crisis. The public and our natural world deserve the best and our future flexibility depends on this. If the draft law is not baptized, the draft law does not risk it only to accelerate the catastrophic acceleration of our natural world to the dependence of everyone,” said Bessie Sprite, CEO of RSPB.

Yougov 2,193 of adults during Thursday and Friday surveyed with 12 % of those who believed in the current planning rules in protecting the country’s natural spaces.