Jensen Jose, organizational advisor to the Non -Science Monitoring Center for Science in the public interest, is based in Washington, based in Washington, DC, explains Jensen Jose, the organizational advisor to the non -profit monitoring center for science in the public interest, based in Washington, DC, aims to exempt GRAS, which was adopted in 1958, and aims to cover the use of common components. “It was so, you will not need new legislation every time you add salt to a sandwich.”
However, with the growth of the appetite for food industry over the following decades, the GRS base came to cover a medium group of ingredients – with these added companies effectively leaving the rule itself. “Hope is to conduct their own scientific studies,” says Jennifer Bumiranz, a public health lawyer and associate professor at the College of Public Health at New York University. “But legally, no one is examined.” In theory, Boumeranz says, “The company can add a new component and not even narrate its chemical compound to the package.”
The result is that a set of additions, recognized as safe under FDA regulations, is prohibited by other governments due to safety concerns. “Vehicles are added to food for the period of validity, beauty and comfort,” says Lindsay Malon, a dietitian in the nutritionist at the Nutrition Department at the Faculty of Medicine at Kis Western Revis University. “Even to how easy the food comes out of the plastic container.”
Vehicles with health risks put the shelves of American grocery stores, which Americans consume every day. Take hydroxytoluene (BHT), for example, a fastening portfolio Hormone disorder. It is often found in pimples, dried snacks and the mixed cakes. Meanwhile, a bundle of gum, potato chips, or processed meat may include hydroxyinezol (BHA), a potential carcinogen. Both are exempt from the FDA regulations through the GRS vulnerability.
In isolation, compounds like BHT, BHA and Moahah are not necessarily dangerous. Public health defenders feel more anxious about their cumulative effect – a life of eating common, destructive and harmful compounds. Malon says it is a diet that is strongly formed Very treated foods– It is likely that it contains additions – it is possible Impact of bowel health. It is assumed that the disrupted microbium leads to increased permeability of the intestine (also known as the “leaked intestine”), which is an unpaid proposed condition where Diseases and toxins It is believed to leak into the bloodstream.
There was some organizational momentum in the United States against harmful additions. In January, the Food and Drug Administration announced a ban on the country level on Red 3, and the oil dye derived from the oil that turned into Candy Scarlet- where studies of the 1980s and the nineties showed that they could Cancer caused laboratory mice. In 2024, it also banned the programmed vegetable oil (BVO), an installer of artificial flavors that could cause the bomos toxic, banned by the United Kingdom in 1970.
The Food and Drug Administration did not immediately respond to suspension requests from WIRED.
However, both additions were banned for the first time by California, in 2023 – Joach says they are more effective vehicles through the legislative bodies of the state from the Food and Drug Administration. “We have made California submit a draft law, pass it, sign a law, and get the banned Red 3 before the FDA (FDA) responds even to a petition in 2022. If the company is not able to sell something in California or New York, it may also reformulate its products to the entire country.”
