The Trump administration argues that the Supreme Court does not mean what he had ruling in nine judges unanimously in the case of Kilmar Abrago Garcia, the Salvaduri man who was sent illegally to Al -Salvadouri Prison because of what the administration claims a “administrative error.” On Thursday, the court ordered the government to “facilitate” the release of Abugo Garcia from the nursery in El Salvador. ” local “The obstacles that hinder the ability of the foreigner to return here,” in fact, there is no other reading of “facilitating” applicable – or constitutional – here. “
We forget any effort to fix the recognized management error by searching for the release of Abrego Garcia from the Salvaduri authorities – which are paid, according to news reports, to his prison and others are shipped there by the United States. The government argued that he was intrusive to the president’s only authority to make foreign relations. So the government’s responsibility here is, what, perhaps, perhaps Abrego Garcia will issue a global entry card to reduce the immigration line if it appears in one way or another at an American airport? This challenging position cannot stand – not if the law is to survive.
In its order, the court sought to secure what it described “with respect for the respect due to the executive authority in the behavior of foreign affairs.” By directing the government to “facilitate” the release of Abu Garcia, the court wondered whether the minimum court went far away in informing the administration “the effect of” his return, and not just “facilitation.” However, the court added, “For its part, the government must be ready to share what could be in relation to the steps it has taken and the possibility of other steps.” During normal times, this residence reflects a suitable respect for the constitutional semester of the authorities. In dealing with this administration, with its maximum concept of the executive authority and its crowded position towards the judiciary, Judges are played For fools.
In the interaction between the courts and the executive authority, the judges apply what is known as the “assumption of regularity”. The courts are generally proceeding that government officials have acted properly. “The assumption of regularity supports the official actions of public employees, and in the absence of clear evidence, on the contrary, the courts assume that they have properly emptied their official duties,” the court ruled in the 1926 case.
But the assumption of regularity is not a necessity for ignorance or a rule that requires the judges to be ostrich. The Trump administration has beented repeatedly and repeatedly, its entitlement to the assumption. Low judges rejected the court Her annoying orders were also ignored. Now, with its escalating challenge in the case of Abrego Garcia, it deals with instructions from the judges themselves with similar lack of respect. The country is about to know whether the judiciary will believe that it suffers from consequences.
The courts must face the chaos of Abrego Garcia for a simple reason that “the government is drunk here”, in the words of J The Trump administration describes Abyerigo Garcia, a twenty-nine-year-old father, as a “member of the murderous MS-13” arrangement and “foreign terrorist” whose return pose a threat to the public. The federal boycott judge who hears his case, Paula Xinis, said that the evidence for his membership in the gangs was not consisted of “nothing more than a Hols hat for him in Chicago, and a mysterious, uncomfortable claim from one of the secret experts claiming to belong to a master’s degree in the twelfth place in New York-in a place that he never lived.” The Federal Court of Appeal found that “Abyerigo Garcia has no criminal history, in this country or anywhere, and that Abyerigo Garcia is a family man who works in a way that lives an exciting and fruitful life”, as a mineral trainee in Bilteville, Maryland.
It does not matter who is right, because even the Trump administration agrees that he should not have to return to the Silvador – where the immigration judge found, he faced threats from another gang, Bario 18, it was blackmailing money from his family PUPUUSERIA. Instead, the administration claims that its hands are linked; Nothing can be done now after Abyerigo Garcia has been detained by the Salvadori authorities.
At a hearing on Friday, the day after the Ruling of the Supreme Court, Shinis was unable to extract basic information from the government lawyer, including about the location of Abu Garcia. (The lawyer who appeared before her was originally suspended, and he admitted the government’s mistake, because of her failure to follow the instructions, along with his supervisor) on Saturday, she received this advanced update: “Abyerigo Garcia is currently being held at the Center for Terrorism in El Salvador. He is alive and believed in this facility. He is being held according to the local authority of the local authority.” Nothing about what has been done to get his release.
President Trump followed a social reality of truth on Saturday night. Trump, who was scheduled to meet with President El Salvadori, Nayb Bokil, On Monday, he wrote, “President Bokali has accepted the nursery of his nation some of the most violent foreign enemies in the world, and in particular the United States. These barbarians are now in the only seizure of Salfador, a proud and sovereignty nation, and their future reaches the president B and his government.” Many of this order from the Supreme Court.
Make the Sunday worse. A written testimony by Ivan Katz, assistant director of the United States for Migration and Customs Enforcement, confirmed that the government “has no updates”-and that, in any case, Katz said, Abrago Garcia is no longer protected from removal even if he was in the United States because Trump announced that MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization. This argument ignores the fact that many federal judges have now questioned whether there was evidence that Abyerigo Garcia was a member of the gang – which is, in a world of due ages, was able to say if he was not extracted from the street and wandered on a plane.
Watch Monday, an agent in the Oval Office, where Public Prosecutor Bondi made a mistake in detention of the Supreme Court, stressing that the judges said only if Al Salvador wanted to return it, we will facilitate it, which means providing a plane. It is not surprising, Bokley indicated that there is no such desire: “How can I return it to the United States – I will heal him to the United States … The question is not useful.”
The behavior of the government in the case of Abu Garcia is sufficiently bad on its own. It is worse because it is part of a pattern of high blockage. Consider the issue that challenges the administration’s use of the law of foreign enemies to send, as well as to El Salvador, Hundreds of Venezuelan men They were claimed by members of the Venezuelan gang, Treen de Aragoa. Trump signed an executive order that calls for Law 1798, then put the alleged gang members on binding aircraft for Salvador before they could protest their removal. When the lawyers sought to intervene in the emergency situations before the provincial judge, James Pasperg, the government lawyer did not announce any knowledge of the trips that were taking off even when it appeared in the court. When Boasberg ordered the lawyer that any flights should be operated in the air – “This is something you need to make sure to comply with it immediately” – the government ignored him. (“OOPSOE … It is too late,” Agent It was posted on X the next morning.) And when Boasberg later sought to obtain information about flights and challenge his matter, the government insisted rudely that it was not obligated to his verbal order, only one written later, then went to the point of calling “the secrets of the state.” Boasberg is now considering whether the administration will be kept in contempt for the court.
Even when this administration obeys an order from the court, it does so reluctantly – basically, with contempt. Take how Bondi complied with an order, from the American boycott judge, John Bates, that federal agencies inform Trump’s executive order against the Jenner & Block. Bondi wrote about Bates, which was called the bench by President George W. Bush, “on March 28, 2025, an unelected local court once again invaded the formulation of policies and freedom of expression, the executive powers of the executive authority. Exaggeration in the judiciary.” If this rebellion is not clear enough, Bondi added, “Of course, as mentioned in the court’s order, the agencies are allowed to continue the course of its normal business that carries the authority that is decided with from the work.”
We were here before, during Trump’s first presidency, when the administration reaps, at least sometimes, the courts of the lack of confidence that it planted. In 2019, Senior judges John RobertsAnd joining the liberal judges to form a majority of five people, and rejected the mutilated management effort to add a question about nationality to the census. The angry Roberts apparently wrote that the logical basis announced by the administration – that the question was necessary to help the administration implement the voting rights law – “it was fabricated.” He added: “Our review is painful,” but we are “we are not required to show the naivety that ordinary citizens are free of charge.” “There is no ordinary citizen, and certainly there is no federal judge, who cannot bear naivety in facing the behavior of this administration without law. I have gained an assumption of irregularity. ♦
