With disbarment decision, John Eastman’s downfall continues

Friday, June 13, it was really bad luck John Eastman, The main architect to President TrumpPlot Results break down From the 2020 presidential elections, a California Appeals Court, accused of reviewing recommendations to discipline lawyers in that state, Confirm the results From the trial judge and recommended that Eastman be “removing the publication of law in California and that the name Eastman obtains the roll of lawyers.”

Judges found that his work in the 2020 election case was poor and deceptive. They said: “The preference,” is necessary to protect the public, the courts and the legal profession. ”

For any lawyer, this is a professional death penalty. But the court’s decision is not only A devastating blow to Eastman But also to Trump legend The 2020 presidential elections were stolen.

That lies Maga’s efforts in the elections for 2024 pushed Trump’s speeches are still moving, including the recent speech He gave the forces in Fort PragueNorth Carolina, as it was hosted by the heads of the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Investigation Office, as well as Parliament Speaker Mike Johnson.

As the court noted, Istmann continues to claim that there are “thorny forces behind former President Biden’s 2020’s victory.”

But like Parliament January 6 And 60 Other courtsJudges who serve the Ministry of Review at the California Bar Court will not have any of them. They made it clear that “in democracy, nothing is essential from the regulatory transport of power that occurs after a fair and unknown electoral process”, and that Trump and Eastman violated the law through conspiracy and lying to disrupt the 2020 elections.

So why is Eastman ruled on Friday?

Case Unique And the veil that this is the only procedure in which Istmann interrogated, along with supporters of supporters, under the oath, interrogated their critics and their full defense of their denial. Eastman – With the help of his 19 -day denial, to testify, 7 Witnesses offer more than 180 documentary exhibitions – he was more than his day in court. He also presented his narration to the stolen elections for the public in pregnancy, where thousands of zooming are monitored.

After considering this evidence, the Ministry of Review Court considered that the “wrong narration” of East Eastman from “necklace forces behind” President Biden’s 2020 winning “led to the undermining of our country’s electoral process, reducing faith in election specialists, and reducing respect for the courts of this land.”

Even if none of the accurate decisions of these two courts in California are not changing the minds of Maga believers and do not honor the Republican leadership in rejecting the great lie, and the decisions and evidence that support them will resist time tests and help in thwarting the historical review. They recorded the record straight and guaranteed that Trump His partners You will have difficulty escaping from the rule of history.

Also, former chief judge Charles Evans Hughes, the court rulings like the person who was submitted last week were not only taken to our current moments, but “to the intelligence of the future day.”

The Eastman case once again shows that wrong information and lying collapses in the courtroom, where it has achieved facts and evidence. Among the main results of the courts:

• Eastman admitted that he does not know any great fraud in the polls that would justify the challenge of the election results.
• Eastman failed to “support the constitution or laws of the United States” and all lawyers must do.
• Eastman was greatly neglected in the failure to investigate the strange results of the statistical studies on which he relied to disrupt the presidential elections – for example, that there was one cadarion for the opportunity of the fourth power in Biden’s four states after Clinton lost it in 2016.
• Eastman knew that his speech on January 6, 2020 was built a speech incomplete discourse on lies and deliberate blindness. “We know that there is … traditional fraud event,” he said. “We know that the dead voted.” At that time, he did not understand that the prosecution was true. The Ministry of Review rejected the defense “mere” rhetoric. ”

  The courts did not find his reliable defense of his fraudulent behaviors and poorly. Both courts rejected Eastman’s allegations that such statements and excessive discourse are constitutionally protected.

  With the realization that all lawyers have the right to amend the first amendment to public data, the Ministry of Review Court said that “this right does not extend to making false or inconsistent statements from reality or law.” Also, the first amendment does not protect a speech “which works as a tool in committing a crime.”

• Eastman falsely informed the crowd “stopping theft” on January 6 “and the country in which the violations of the election law and fraudulent vote were changed as a result of the presidential elections. Part of the evidence? As the trial judge pointed out, on November 29, 2020, Eastman wrote to his colleague, Maga Mitchell’s lawyer, that he does not know any actual evidence of fraud in the result in any states:” It will be good to have documented evidence Actually on fraud. ”
• The biggest lie in Eastman was that Vice President Pines has the authority to interfere in electoral voting. Esstman and Trump knew that Pins had no such power, however, on behalf of the president, Eastman continued to pressure Bens and his lawyer to disable the number of electoral college.

  Even the severe constitutional expert in Eastman and the friend of the family, conservative professor John Yu, turned against Eastman. Yoo admitted amazingly that the idea of ​​the alternative to Trump-Eastman was “a makeup conflict, not real” and that Pence’s rejection of the husband’s arguments was “unavailable.”

• The Ministry of Review also confirmed that Eastman’s certificate during disciplinary procedures showed that his beliefs were not sincere, honest or credible. From start to end, the court found that he “used his skills to pay a false narration in the courtroom, the White House and the media.”

Despite these good and well -documented results, California insists on it must Meet the heavy burden From “clear and convincing evidence” before the lawyer was dismissed, the senior election lawyer in Trump remained a challenge, not trusted and not reliable. Eastman described the bar as “political persecution.”

He insisted that those who have charged him “must be themselves,” and that the office of the chief trial consultant in the Bar Association and the trial judge was “partisan” actors who made contributions to the campaign to the Democrats.

This speech, of course, looks frighteningly familiar.

Eastman probably attractiveness To the California Supreme Court And if he loses there, ultimately to the United States Supreme Court for the reasons for the first amendment.

It is also possible that when the next Supreme Supreme Court vacate, Trump Eastman may nominate. After all, if we can have a convicted criminal in the White House, then why is he not a deformed lawyer, but loyal, on the highest court in the country?

Whatever the disclosure of Eastman, and despite the deep damage achieved by Trump’s denial in the elections of American democracy, the Istman issue clarifies the confidence of Alexander Hamilton that this nation is Good served by the independent judiciary.

As if the expectation of denying the elections for Trump and East, Hamilton has argued that the courts “will preserve the constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of … the actions of men’s design or a special effect [circumstances which] Sometimes people spread themselves … ”

Nearly 250 years, Hamilton looks positively.