Blake Lively Team Shrugs Off Defamation Suit Over Alleged Smear Campaign Planner

Hours after Jed Wallace fired a lawsuit against $ 7 million against Blake Blake Today, the lawyer for the self -described “human crisis” admitted End with us Actress “Continuous bitter battles with Justin BalouniHis company, supporters and propaganda.

This is not the first time that the TAT strategy has been used in this chaotic issue increasingly over about two months.

Tuesday step vitality and Ryan Reynolds“Lawyers in the courts of Hayes County to drop their request to the founder of relations in Texas and the ties in the streets to give the deposit under the department about what he did and did not do a counter -online campaign last year against gossip girl It was the veterinarian I mentioned for the first time on the deadline. It was somewhat clear, of the statements made by lawyer Michael Gotlal in A hearing in New York February 3 On the suit of its client Nai against the Donor and On January 16, on January 16, and a suit of $ 400 million Against his star in IEWU, her dead pool Baal and their propaganda that Wallace was a very possible candidate to be officially included in the unified case.

lawyer Bian Friedman And propaganda Melissa Nathan The other lawyer in Wallace, Chip Babcock, who put everything on the table today, for the best and worst.

Related to: Blake Livley and Ryan Reynolds aim to file a 400 million dollar defamation of Justin’s defamation

“Blake Livley made false statements to the press through a special administrative file, claiming that Mr. Wallace and the relations in the streets may hide her sexually, and avenged against her, and helping others who did the same, and is interested in contracting with her and participated in an inappropriate one. For his client in a statement on Wednesday. Wallace, who is a very special person, never met or spoke to Mrs. Livly. never. He did not participate in a distortion campaign against her at any time. The decision to present this lawsuit to protect himself, and his family was taken after Mrs. Lavly came against him first in Texas, and even indicated that she intends to designate him in another lawsuit. “

It was named Sexual harassment and revenge complaint on December 20 To the Ministry of Civil Rights in California, which put this prominent and multi -sided issue in the public domain, Wallace was not part of the initial lawsuit on December 31 against Baldouni, Haifar Studios, Head of Public Relations in the crisis Nathan and the propaganda of Jennifer Abel. Although this pre -law is not called Wallace, its presence is still clear only regarding vital revenge it says it has suffered. Wallace in no way is not related to vital harassment that she was exposed to it during IEWU Production, nor for any violation of the contract – so he was a little protest here.

Related to: If*Cked Up: Justin tells Blake Levli in late night 2023 vm

What Lively Lawyers said in their desire now that they now rejected them last month to obtain Wallace to sit for sedimentation, that street relations implement a digital army throughout the country from New York to Los Angeles to create and enhance content. This seems to be authentic on social media platforms and online chat forums. “

With all of this, the entire conflict is scheduled to start trial on March 9, 2026.

No modified complaint of Lively/Reynolds has been put in the court’s court schedule so far, but I hear it is just a matter of days, not if.

It is clear that Wallace is close to Nathan and Faridman at a level, even if he has not already been appointed before in the alleged coordination IEWU ”S August 2024 Premiere. It seems that the subcontractor described on the Internet is the aforementioned “Jed” or implicitly in many text messages on the online attacks on the vibrant between Nathan and Ayab and their crew last year-but it may not be.

Regardless, in his complaint submitted today, Wallace says that the highlight of Levli has cost him dangerous money because his name continues to go out in a number of publications, broadcasts and publications (such as ELLE) – falsely – with mutual lands and mutual baladochemical war in the courts and the Public Opinion Court. The media storm caused “millions of dollars to harm the prevailing loss of his company, which exceeds one million people,” says Wallace.

As for Lively, as one expects in the TIT scenario, this is the same thing in a position that he witnessed and insisted that they were the ones who suffered a campaign of distortion, professional burning and burning in the hands of the strong Ladypool couple.

Lawyers in Manattt, Phenps and Willkie Farr & Gallagher companies said in a statement in a statement of their own statement. “This is not just a propaganda trick – it is a transparent revenge in response to the allegations received in the complaint of sexual harassment and revenge that Mrs. Livly submitted to the Civil Rights Ministry of California. While this lawsuit will be rejected, we are pleased that Mr. Wallace has finally left the shadow, and that he will be held accountable for the court Federal also.

There is nothing almost the parties to this. For example: the documents submitted on Tuesday by both sides estimated, can take next year’s trial anywhere in two weeks, according to Liveey, to a month and a half, according to Baldoni.