Trump rescinds Emtala guidance protecting women in need of emergency abortions | Trump administration

the Trump administration On Tuesday, he canceled the directives miscarriage The embargo cannot send the deportation of pregnant patients who are in the midst of medical emergencies-a step that comes amid multiple battles from the Red States Court about guidance.

The guidelines deals with the medical treatment law and Federal Medical Therapy (EMTALA), which requires hospitals to stabilize patients who face medical emergencies. Countries like Idahu and Texas have argued that the Biden administration guidelines, which were issued in the wake of the extinction of 2022 Roe V Wade, were incorrectly interpreted EMTALA.

In her message to cancel the guidance, Trump administration He said that the Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) service centers “will continue to impose EMTala, which protects all individuals who are submitted to the emergency department in hospitals who ask for examination or treatment, including specific medical conditions that put the health of pregnant women or her child who has not yet been born in dangerous. CMS will correct any legal and created confusion in previous procedures.”

Abortion rights supporters said on Tuesday that the cancellation of the Biden administration guidelines will abandon the ability of hospitals to explain EMTAL and endanger the lives of pregnant patients. Since the collapse of Row, Dozens of women advance Saying that they are depriving medical treatment due to the prohibition of miscarriage. A I mentioned five pregnant women who have died After they were refused to take care of or delay them, or the inability to reach legal abortion.

“This procedure sends a clear message: pregnant life and health does not deserve protection,” Dr. Jimilla Beret, OB-Gyn and the head of doctors for childbearing healthHe said in a statement. “Compliance with this law can mean the difference between life and death for pregnant people, forcing service providers like me to choose between caring for a person at the time of their need and turning my back on them to comply with harsh and dangerous laws.”

Last year, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in A. The case that involves a ban on abortion in Idaho stateAnd, which only allowed abortion in cases where a woman’s life was in danger. On the other hand, most of the abortion prohibition allows the state to abort when the patient’s “health” is in danger – a lower standard that may make it easier for doctors to interfere. The Biden Administration said that the Idahu standard prevented doctors from providing miscarriage in some emergency situations and thus violated Ametala’s requirements that hospitals should settle patients.

In the end, the Supreme Court The girl of this case Through the ruling 6-3 on a procedural basis that the case was “granted”, which indicates that it should not have been raised in the first place.

“This court had an opportunity to bring clarity and certainty to this tragic situation and we dispel it,” wrote Kitanji Brown Jackson, the Supreme Court judge at that time. “We have always refused to declare what is required by law, pregnant patients in the state of Idahu, Texas and other places will pay the price.”

Tuesday’s step for the Trump administration is not unexpected. In March, the administration I moved to leaving the case On the prohibition of miscarriage in the state of Idaho. IDaho Local Hospital later subsequently filed a lawsuit for the embargo.